Post history

History for reg22

New Zealand Men's U-17s

Back to topic

Current version

Posted October 27, 2019 03:01 · last edited October 27, 2019 03:02

We played a back 5, with none showing the ability to bring the ball out or pass it out (apart from Naicker when he moved to the left side). This meant that one of the 3 midfielders had to drop in to play forward. 2 of the three midfielders showed limited distribution ability. 

5 back and one dropping in left us with no way to open the field and play good balls forward. All of which meant we gave the ball away a whole lot. In this formation, the wing backs need to be much higher when we have the ball and at least one central defender needs to be able to pass out.

Delivery up front was slow. When play became broken, we showed a desire to tidy it up and slow it down instead of transitioning forward quickly. When our forwards received good ball, they looked pretty good.

Stamenic is great to watch

Previous versions

1 version
Unknown editor edited October 27, 2019 03:02

We played a back 5, with none showing the ability to bring the ball out or pass it out (apart from Naicker when he moved to the left side). This meant that one of the 3 midfielders had to drop in to play forward. 2 of the three midfielders showed limited distribution ability. 

5 back and one dropping in left us with no way to open the field and play good balls forward. All of which meant we gave the ball away a whole lot. In this formation, the wing backs need to be much higher when we have the ball and at least one defender needs to be able to pass out.

Delivery up front was slow. When play became broken, we showed a desire to tidy it up and slow it down instead of transitioning forward quickly. When our forwards received good ball, they looked pretty good.

Stamenic is great to watch