Posted May 01, 2017 05:26 · last edited May 01, 2017 05:30
Is he U17 elligible? If so then they won't pick him for U-20 as then he can't play in the U-17s (is my recollection). Just a theory otherwise it's an odd choice as you say although he'd be behind all the other named WeeNix defenders at this stage based on what I have seen of him.
Ignore me. He played in the last 17s so can't do that twice and probably means he's now 18.
Also McGarry is wasted as a defender.
Is he U17 elligible? If so then they won't pick him for U-20 as then he can't play in the U-17s (is my recollection). Just a theory otherwise it's an odd choice as you say.
Ignore me. He played in the last 17s so can't do that twice and probably means he's now 18.
Also McGarry is wasted as a defender.
Is he U17 elligible? If so then they won't pick him for U-20 as then he can't play in the U-17s (is my recollection). Just a theory otherwise it's an odd choice as you say.
Also McGarry is wasted as a defender.
Is he U17 elligible? If so then they won't pick him for U-20 as then he can't play in the U-17s (is my recollection). Just a theory otherwise it's an odd choice as you say.