Post history

History for ajc28

Coliseum Sports - EPL Overlords

Back to topic

Current version

Posted August 07, 2014 02:30 · last edited August 07, 2014 02:35

Jeff Vader wrote:

For me and more than a few others, its the best outcome

1: Its works on the set up I have. I have a TV, sound system and remote. No fucking about.

2: It costs me nothing extra. As Tegal always says, I pay the $1000 already.

3: I could care less if other live games are on the same times as others. Chances are high I will pick the one that interests me the most in that case and its not like I follow all 20 EPL teams and watch all 10 games. In all honesty, I'll MySky 100% of the games I want to watch anyway cause I'm not getting up and sparrow fart o'clock.

4: It also wont be the end of the world if I happen to catch the result before I watch the game nor will I lose my shit over it.

It's the best case for me for the same reasons. In HD, on my TV with no stuttering issues and with my remote. I'm already paying for Sky for other sports anyway. And live was never key for me as I always tended to record and watch as live when I got up rather than getting up in the night. I don't necessarily need a dedicated football channel, and as Tegal says that's sure to cost an extra $20 a month or something. The way they did it before spreading games over a few channels was fine and they would still be able to show 4 games live (unless Sky Sport 5 and 6 became more permanent then more), and then the rest straight after them.

The bidding will be interesting after next season.

Previous versions

3 versions

ajc28 edited August 07, 2014 02:35

Jeff Vader wrote:

For me and more than a few others, its the best outcome

1: Its works on the set up I have. I have a TV, sound system and remote. No fucking about.

2: It costs me nothing extra. As Tegal always says, I pay the $1000 already.

4: It also wont be the end of the world if I happen to catch the result before I watch the game nor will I lose my shit over it.

It's the best case for me for the same reasons. In HD, ony my TV and with my remote. I'm already paying for Sky for other sports anyway. And live was never key for me as I always tended to record and watch as live when I got up rather than getting up in the night. I don't necessarily need a dedicated football channel, and as Tegal says that's sure to cost an extra $20 a month or something. The way they did it before spreading games over a few channels was fine and they would still be able to show 4 games live (unless Sky Sport 5 and 6 became more permanent then more), and then the rest straight after them.

The bidding will be interesting after next season.

ajc28 edited August 07, 2014 02:32

Jeff Vader wrote:

For me and more than a few others, its the best outcome

1: Its works on the set up I have. I have a TV, sound system and remote. No fucking about.

2: It costs me nothing extra. As Tegal always says, I pay the $1000 already.

4: It also wont be the end of the world if I happen to catch the result before I watch the game nor will I lose my shit over it.

It's the best case for me for the same reasons. In HD, ony my TV and with my remote. I'm already paying for Sky for other sports anyway. And live was never key for me as I always tended to record and watch as live when I got up rather than getting up in the night. I don't necessarily need a dedicated football channel. The way they did it before spreading games over a few channels was fine and they would still be able to show 4 games live (unless Sky Sport 5 and 6 became more permanent then more), and then the rest straight after them.

The bidding will be interesting after next season.

ajc28 edited August 07, 2014 02:31

Jeff Vader wrote:

For me and more than a few others, its the best outcome

1: Its works on the set up I have. I have a TV, sound system and remote. No fucking about.

2: It costs me nothing extra. As Tegal always says, I pay the $1000 already.

4: It also wont be the end of the world if I happen to catch the result before I watch the game nor will I lose my shit over it.

It's the best case for me for the same reasons. In HD, ony my TV and with my remote. I'm already paying for Sky for other sports anyway. And live was never key for me as I always tended to record and watch as live when I got up rather than getting up in the night. I don't necessarily need a dedicated football channel. The way they did it before spreading games over a few channels was fine and they would still be able to show 4 games live (unless Sky Sport 5 and 6 became more permanent then more), and then the rest straight after them. The bidding will be interesting after next season.