Posted October 26, 2012 02:35 · last edited October 26, 2012 02:39
Logo is amateur. Why?
1. Colours don't represent NZ in any way at all; not white/black or even brand NZ blue/green
2. Lack of integration of fonts - the NZ hand-drawn abomination; a san serif for the words New Zealand and a serif for 2015;
3. the football represenation is miniscule - and is made worse by housing it in a square blue box; surely the 'world' game, the roundball game lends itself to a circular housing device
Logo is amateur. Why?
1. Colours don't represent NZ in any way at all; not white/black or even brand NZ blue/green
2. Lack of integration of fonts - the NZ hand-drawn abomination; a san serif for the words New Zealand and a serif for 2015;
3. the football represenation is miniscule - and is made worse by housing it in a square blue box; surely the 'world' game, the roundball game lens itself to a circular housing device
Logo is amateur. Why?
1. Colours don't represent NZ in any way at all; no white, black or even brand NZ blue/green
2. Lack of integration of fonts - the NZ hand-drawn abomination; a san serif for the words New Zealand and a serif for 2015;
3. the football represenation is miniscule - especially when housed in a square blue box
Logo is amateur. Why?
1. Colours don't represent NZ in any way at all;
2. Three different fonts used - the NZ hand-drawn abomination; a san serif ffor the words New Zealand and a serif got 2015;
3. the football represenation is miniscule - especially when housed in a square blue box
Amateur!