Current version

Posted March 20, 2016 08:47 · last edited March 20, 2016 08:50

Steve-O wrote:

We have won 7 out of 24 games this season so our problem is a bit more than merely 'consistency'.  We are consistently poor.  Those away games in Sydney have masked a truly horrendous run.

Aren't you just picking and choosing how to interpret our results? We win games and it's masking our poor results but we lose games and it's a sign we are shark.

If you had an absolutely equal win/draw/loss ratio after 24 games you would expect 8 wins, so 7  wins in 24 isn't significantly worse. Ok, we've lost more than we should have, I'll give you that. I just think all this angst is a bit much. If we had managed to beat CCM twice and the Jest twice instead of losing those games we would be equal on points with the Glory in 5th. Isn't beating good teams and losing to shark teams almost the definition of inconsistency?

Not saying we have been good, but the margins between us and the good teams aren't as great as some people are making out.

Previous versions

1 version
ConanTroutman edited March 20, 2016 08:50
Steve-O wrote:

We have won 7 out of 24 games this season so our problem is a bit more than merely 'consistency'.  We are consistently poor.  Those away games in Sydney have masked a truly horrendous run.

Aren't you just picking and choosing how to interpret our results? We win games and it's masking our poor results but we lose games and it's a sign we are shark.

If you had an absolutely equal win/draw/loss ratio after 24 games you would expect 8 wins, so 7  wins in 24 isn't significantly worse. Ok, we've lost more than we should have, I'll give you that. I just think all this angst is a bit much. If we had managed to beat CCM twice and the Jest twice instead of losing those games we would be equal on points with the Glory in 5th. Isn't beating good teams and losing to shark teams almost the definition of inconsistency?