If everyone remembers back in 2010 World Cup in SOUTH AFRICA they use the name to no offence, no backlash and a full understanding on where the name came about. So if it was excepted @ a World Cup in African continent then i see no harm in the name and it should stay. There is to much woke and cancel culture out there not to mention BLM movement that makes names like this sensitive but does it?
Australia went through this as well back in 2002 and wanted to drop the Socceroo name to just call them Australia national team but the name had a cultural significances because of the Vietnam war (where they got their name) and they didn't go ahead with the change.
Australia went through this as well back in 2002 and wanted to drop the Socceroo name to just call them Australia national team but the name had a cultural significances because of the Vietnam war (where they got their name) and they didn't go ahead with the change.
How do you know there was no offence, no backlash and full understanding in 2010? Did you ask everyone? Was there a survey? To be honest I’m not sure you’re doing your side any favours with your ‘this is stupid and also the BLM movement has gone too far’ argument.
It was the biggest sporting event in the world that year, IF the name "All Whites" offended anyone it would have made headlines. It didn't and if it did everyone would known about it.