Current version

Posted August 23, 2021 01:29 · last edited August 23, 2021 01:41

If everyone remembers back in 2010 World Cup in SOUTH AFRICA they use the name to no offence, no backlash and a full understanding on where the name came about. So if it was excepted @ a World Cup in African continent then i see no harm in the name and it should stay. There is to much woke and cancel culture out there not to mention BLM movement that makes names like this sensitive but does it? 
Australia went through this as well back in 2002 and wanted to drop the Socceroo name to just call them Australia national team but the name had a cultural significances because of the Vietnam war (where they got their name) and they didn't go ahead with the change.

Previous versions

2 versions
Unknown editor edited August 23, 2021 01:41
If everyone remembers back in 2010 World Cup in SOUTH AFRICA they use the name to no offence, no backlash and a full understanding on where the name came about. So if it was excepted @ a World Cup in African continent then i see no harm in the name and it should stay. There is to much woke and cancel culture out there not to mention BLM movement that makes names like this sensitive but does it? 
Australia went through this as well back in 2002 and wanted to drop the Socceroo name to just call them Australia national team but the name had a cultural significances because of the Vietnam war (where they got there name) and they didn't go ahead with the change.
Unknown editor edited August 23, 2021 01:39
If everyone remembers back in 2010 World Cup in SOUTH AFRICA they use the name to no offence, no backlash and a full understanding on where the name came about. So if it was excepted @ a World Cup in African continent then i see no harm in the name and it should stay. There is to much woke and cancel culture out there not to mention BLM movement that makes names like this sensitive but does it?