Depends how likely they think nz are to get into those top 5 spots every 4 years. I'd argue that if effectively increases their spots from 4.5 to something like 4.7-4.8
There are of course other factors. But its not entirely against their interests.
Posted July 05, 2013 07:13 · last edited July 05, 2013 07:13
Depends how likely they think nz are to get into those top 5 spots every 4 years. I'd argue that if effectively increases their spots from 4.5 to something like 4.7-4.8
There are of course other factors. But its not entirely against their interests.
Depends how likely they think nz are to get into those top 5 spots every 4 years. I'd argue that if effectively increases there spots from 4.5 to something like 4.7-4.8
There are of course other factors. But its not entirely against their interests.
Depends how likely they think nz are to get into those top 5 spots every 4 years. I'd argue that if effectively increases there spots from 4.5 to something like 4.8-4.9
There are of course other factors. But its not entirely against their interests.