imanixsupporter wrote:martinb wrote:I think he should be a gamechanger, i.e. on the bench. Would rather turn to him rather than some of the others in his general position if it is late in a game and we are desperately needing a goal
Randall on form has that ability to be underestimated.
He is just a bit more wily, a bit faster, a bit stronger and a bit quicker getting his shot off than you’d expect.
If he’s on form or comes right, to me that’s exactly the kind of thing that can win you games.
Him and Bayliss both shoot. A lot. And Randall is direct. Not a lot of passing backwards.
I still think he’s potentially a game changer for us. We need goals.
Edit: was talking about Randall here. Hard to know Bayliss' place with how little he has played for us
I like the idea of not taking a backward step from the start. Pair him with a fresh Cacace and/Old.
We haven’t seen a lot of Waine or McCowatt so far.
It’s really hard to know what our best road to goal might be. Old/Cacace/Payne whipping it flat across the box? Trying to out that curving ball in behind? Looking for the counter?
Corners, obviously, if we can get em.
Pressing high early with McCowatt?
My biggest concern is that we haven’t scored enough in the last two years and we haven’t scored since we arrived in the USA.
We haven’t seen a lot of Waine or McCowatt so far.
It’s really hard to know what our best road to goal might be. Old/Cacace/Payne whipping it flat across the box? Trying to out that curving ball in behind? Looking for the counter?
Corners, obviously, if we can get em.
Pressing high early with McCowatt?
My biggest concern is that we haven’t scored enough in the last two years and we haven’t scored since we arrived in the USA.