History for Global Game

<p>We'll just have to agree to disagree Hello Beaver as I don't think monopolies are the best model. In my experience private providers look to go far beyond the lowest common denominator - through training programmes, overseas tournament experiences, and generally  aiming higher than playing local footy. They operate in that part of the NZF 'strategic direction' that seeks to produce players who are capable of playing professionally/internationally. I think on that basis alone, most private providers are stakeholders. </p><p>Why would NZF want to exclude them? Becasue they affect the revenue stream into NZF coffers or because they're difficult to work with, or heaven forbid, have their own ideas?  Any of those reasons appear a) short-sighted or b) extreme protectionism based on fear. People have 10 days to have their say - ridiculous in itself.</p>