If it is true that some of the NZF staffers were trying to get some of the Ferns to either alter of withdraw their statement when surely they must be gone.
Will be interesting to see what the terms of reference are and the make up of who is going to investiage the whole matter.
May be the case.
But ethically and morally it is wrong and the NZF staffers must have know that as well, or was it a case of trying to save their own jobs / roles.
Is followingly blindly really a defence?