Part of me wants to see the team fail to qualify, so that NZF and aspiring players will finally start taking these qualifying games seriously. Most other nations with eyes set on Rio will be fielding full strength sides from the very beginning, yet as always we're making excuses about players "settling in" at their new club or "reporting for the first club training" or some such shark. This qualifying tournament could well be another 'Nightmare in Honiara'
Nah, many countries don't call up their best u-23 players or don't get them released.
Look at the UEFA qualifying this week (ridiculously called an "u-21" tournament but players can be up to 23)
People in England have been complaining for years that their u-21 team doesn't get the best players released by clubs.
Germany u-21 obviously couldn't select any of their u-20 players who were in NZ.
The England u-21 team that crashed out of the Olympic qualifying this week was missing many of England's best players like Sterling, Barkley, Wilshire, Oxlade-Chamberlain, Shaw, Zaha etc.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-...
"As the Italian goals went in to confirm another early England exit from the European Under 21 Championship, a familiar feeling began to gnaw.
Just exactly why were the very best players available at this age group not competing?
We have heard the arguments about team unity and understand the exacting stances of clubs on their assets...."
All except one of Italy's players vs. England were established Serie A players - only four of England's were EPL regulars.
Italy didn't qualify either - but finished above England.
Sweden who have qualified for the Olympics included eleven players with senior caps; Denmark ten.
The German team failed to get several top players from German clubs released - Bayern wouldn't release any at all - and only just made the Olympics after winning one group game and drawing two.