Posted July 15, 2015 10:38 · last edited July 15, 2015 10:41
With all due respect to AMac, he is quoting one lawyers interpretation of 5.1 (which is a very liberal and loose one)
Somehow because he is Swiss I think you are taking it for gospel.
It is clear that the other statutes flow from it and which one is applicable to our boy
Which AMac has highlighted if you read his whole post
With all due respect to AMac, he is quoting one lawyers interpretation of 5.1 (which is a very very liberal and loose one)
Somehow because he is Swiss I think you are taking it for gospel.
It is clear that the other statutes flow from it and which one is applicable to our boy
Which AMac has highlighted if you read his whole post
With all due respect to AMac, he is quoting one lawyers interpretation of 5.1 (which is a very very liberal and loose one)
Somehow because he is Swiss I think you are taking it for gospel.
It is clear that the other statutes flow from it and which one is applicable to our boy
Which AMac has highlighted if you read his whole post
With all due respect to AMac, he is quoting one lawyers interpretation of 5.1 (which is a very very liberal and loose one)
Somehow because he is Swiss I think you are taking it for gospel.
It is clear that the other statutes flow from it and which one is applicable to our boy