I think it should be 4 at the back, so big questions for me about why we have 4 CBs when Stensness is more than capable of covering in a pinch. Makes me wonder if a back 5 is a possibility, or if this is a missed chance for more attacking midfield options.
I expect it will be 4 at the back, so big questions for me about why we have 4 CBs when Stensness is more than capable of covering in a pinch. Makes me wonder if a back 5 is a possibility, or if this is a missed chance for more attacking midfield options.