Post history

History for ThreeFourThree

Vs Mexico 1st Leg Thurs 14th 9:30am SS2

Back to topic

Current version

Posted November 15, 2013 04:41 · last edited November 15, 2013 04:48

Jeff Vader wrote:
 
I do agree that Christie should have not been there. As for Lochhead, everyone says "Tuiloma should have played" without any evidence that he would have done a better job. If you were the coach you would have banked on him to do a job he has done in the past as well vs a kid playing youth football and until 5 months ago, northern league football????? He seems to have gone from northern prems to international LB in the space of 5 months and there was nothing he did at Birkenhead that suggests he is at that level YET (or even in the next year)


I didn't say Tuiloma should have been in for Lochhead - just that he should have been in starting team ( and Lochhead shouldn't have ).


Personally I would have had him on the pitch in place of Bertos.


Previous versions

1 version
ThreeFourThree edited November 15, 2013 04:48
Jeff Vader wrote:
 
I do agree that Christie should have not been there. As for Lochhead, everyone says "Tuiloma should have played" without any evidence that he would have done a better job. If you were the coach you would have banked on him to do a job he has done in the past as well vs a kid playing youth football and until 5 months ago, northern league football????? He seems to have gone from northern prems to international LB in the space of 5 months and there was nothing he did at Birkenhead that suggests he is at that level YET (or even in the next year)

I NEVER said Tuiloma should have been in for Lochhead - just that he should have been in starting team.

Personally I would have had him on the pitch in place of Bertos.