Instead of there being 11 starting places, five bench places, and seven squad places in Canterbury and in Otago – as is the case with the existing setup, Canterbury United, and Southern United, making time for youngsters very hard to come by – there are now 88 and 40 in Canterbury and 88 and 40 in Otago.
This is precisely why the new system is such a terrible idea. Let's get as much donkey into the National League, and get dumb clubs (we all know who I'm talking about) to pay them sharkloads whike they're at it. Sorru, I mean ask them to do a lot of 'coaching'.
The sad reality is that there's probably only 11-12 clubs in the country that can actually make a fist of it, so basically the whole system's been changed just to give Olympic, Birko, or Wests a chance to be in the national league.
11>8
I can get up over 20 pretty quickly...
Interested to hear who they are. There's a maximum of 5-6 clubs who can do this across Central and Mainland Leagues (and including the South in that too). So there are 15+ clubs in the Northern region who can do this? I find that extremely difficult to believe.
Clarify what you mean by 'do this' first... but I have 20 clubs that I generally would consider to be what NZF is looking for from a club – or of the size that makes them able to become what NZF is looking for rather swiftly.
Firstly, I'm amazed that you think that NZF actually knows what they want from the clubs under this system, but nevermind.
What I mean is, clubs that have strategic and financial capability and capacity to sustainably participate in the new National League system long-term.
On the pitch, I think NZF wants clubs that have teams right down through all the 11-a-side grades and that bring players through into their first team from within their own ranks.
I'll offer this list (which also takes into account off-the-pitch factors) of 22 clubs as a starting point
Auckland City/Central United
Auckland United
Birkenhead United
Eastern Suburbs
Manukau United
Northern Rovers
West Coast Rangers
Western Springs
Hamilton Wanderers
Melville United
Napier City Rovers
Wairarapa United
Lower Hutt City
Miramar Rangers
North Wellington
Wellington Olympic
Western Suburbs
Nelson Suburbs
Cashmere Technical
Christchurch United
Nomads United
South City Royals
while admitting I don't know much about the ins and outs of Otago clubs, so may have done some an injustice by leaving them off (and that I may be being too cautious in Canterbury – I'd expect Coastal Spirit and Ferrymead Bays to contest the qualification spots down there and I'd say Selwyn United has solid structures in place).
Edit: Will add that not all of these clubs are necessary there as things stand, some are, some aren't that far away, some need a mindset shift.
I'll stay away from Northern and South Island clubs, there are better placed people than ne to comment on that. Although I certainly have strong doubts about SI clubs outside of Christchurch, the Dunedin merger notwithstanding.
But the Central League is really only 4 clubs, Miramar, Wests, NCR, and Olympic, but Olympic don't have a junior club so will undoubtedly lean on their supporters to throw lots of cash at players.
Wairarapa, Lower Hutt, North Wellington? Forget about it. Not in our lifetimes.
Not in our lifetimes ... what though? They're seven clubs doing good things either in the competitive space or the development space or both and the change of system allows them all to flourish.
