a tad short sighted jd
distribution is slanted in favour of the area it was attained to do more social good in that area and thus indirectly offset the damage that gambling has done (gambling being a social bad)
This is the point - I don't see how the "social good" of funding amateur sport off sets people gambling. The two are unrelated. It's an intellectual construct
As long as people are doing good work that benefits the community then I don't see what the problem is? Tighten up the use of funds by all means byt I don't see how hyper-local distribution is a positive