Posted September 06, 2025 21:06
· last edited September 06, 2025 21:06
20 Legend
Napier Phoenix
Do you have a link to the OFC report card please?20 Legend
Sorry to beat a dead horse, but I still don't understand what the Nix's argument is.
They've called it a disgrace, and says the process lacks transparency. Yet they haven't actually given any examples which support that. Now that OFC have released their respective report cards, the opposite seems true.
Other than "we're the Phoenix" can someone cite an argument made by Dome that they'd be a better choice than Auckland or Christchurch?
No need to be flippant... Dome has the report and barely even mentioned it. The club is trying to make a point that OFC lack transparency yet they've given us no indication as to what the report card was missing.
So far the message has been "it's unfair" without any actual rationale. I'm looking to understand what the club's actual argument is, because so it's all just baseless claims.
The report basically says we meet the requirements for entry but doesn't say at all/in enough detail for Dome how we faired relatively compared to others (other than scoring lower) and what areas of the bid could have been better.
It does feel like Dome would like to see how they worked things out incl. for competing bids, not just the answers.
Previous versions
1 version
Unknown editoredited September 06, 2025 21:06
20 Legend
Napier Phoenix
Do you have a link to the OFC report card please?20 Legend
Sorry to beat a dead horse, but I still don't understand what the Nix's argument is.
They've called it a disgrace, and says the process lacks transparency. Yet they haven't actually given any examples which support that. Now that OFC have released their respective report cards, the opposite seems true.
Other than "we're the Phoenix" can someone cite an argument made by Dome that they'd be a better choice than Auckland or Christchurch?
No need to be flippant... Dome has the report and barely even mentioned it. The club is trying to make a point that OFC lack transparency yet they've given us no indication as to what the report card was missing.
So far the message has been "it's unfair" without any actual rationale. I'm looking to understand what the club's actual argument is, because so it's all just baseless claims.
The report basically says we meet the requirements for entry but doesn't say att all/in enough detail for Dome how we faired relatively compared to others (other than scoring lower) and what areas of the bid could have been better.
It does feel like Dome would like to see how they worked things out incl. for competing bids, not just the answers.