Post history

History for PaulSG

Chelsea thread

Back to topic

Current version

Posted November 22, 2012 18:53 · last edited November 22, 2012 18:54

Arsenal wrote:
It's still much better than being run by a megalomaniac sugar daddy. Arsenal are run the right way and 'plenty of Gooners' would agree with me, with 60k selling out every game. 
The fact is, all your 'history' could have easily gone to Fulham QPR etc if Roman had chosen a different spot on the map. 

We'll agree to disagree on the running of Arsenal then. Difference is you have two megalomaniacs running that club, neither has enough of a share to have ultimate control though... yet.

But opposing fans talking of our lack of history pre-Abramovich clearly know absolutely nothing. We won competitions such as the European Cup Winner's Cup (first time in 1971), FA Cup, League Cup European Supercup and the old Division One in 1955 (modern day Premiership) well in advance of Roman's arrival. So to say we have no "history" pre-Abramovich is utter nonsense.

Previous versions

1 version
PaulSG edited November 22, 2012 18:54
Arsenal wrote:
It's still much better than being run by a megalomaniac sugar daddy. Arsenal are run the right way and 'plenty of Gooners' would agree with me, with 60k selling out every game. 
The fact is, all your 'history' could have easily gone to Fulham QPR etc if Roman had chosen a different spot on the map. 

We'll agree to disagree on the running of Arsenal then. Difference is you have two megalomaniacs running that club, neither has enough of a share to have ultimate control though... yet.

But opposing fans talking of our lack of history pre-Abramovich clearly know absolutely nothing. We won competitions ranging from the European Cup Winner's Cup to the FA Cup, League Cup European Supercup and the old Division One (modern day Premiership) well in advance of Roman's arrival. So to say we have no "history" is utter nonsense.