Marquee
1.4K
·
5.3K
·
about 17 years

james dean wrote:

I've been thinking a bit about the future of the AWs on a reduced budget.  

Next two years the All Whites, for all intents and purposes, are the U23 team.  Spend all the money on the team for that tournamen.t  Run the AWs over a 2 year programme rather than a 4 year programme after the Olympics in 2020.

Someone who knows more about the schedule will be able to pick holes in this, but if we have a limited pot of cash why not spend it at the pointy end only?

Just make sure that the players are eligible to play for NZ!
First Team Squad
320
·
1.4K
·
almost 17 years

JamesBo wrote:

Danny Hay is a lot worse than Hudson.

In what way?

Marquee
1.2K
·
5.5K
·
almost 14 years

james dean wrote:

I've been thinking a bit about the future of the AWs on a reduced budget.  

Next two years the All Whites, for all intents and purposes, are the U23 team.  Spend all the money on the team for that tournamen.t  Run the AWs over a 2 year programme rather than a 4 year programme after the Olympics in 2020.

Someone who knows more about the schedule will be able to pick holes in this, but if we have a limited pot of cash why not spend it at the pointy end only?

Has the 2020 U23 coach even been appointed yet?

WeeNix
410
·
920
·
over 11 years

JamesBo wrote:

Danny Hay is a lot worse than Hudson.

See post #1994... Chopah has spoken

Marquee
4.5K
·
5.8K
·
about 12 years

I'd take Ramon - see what he has done with ACFC and has a reputation for getting the best out of players and developing young talent... plus he would cost the earth.

Starting XI
1.3K
·
2.8K
·
over 9 years

Marto wrote:

Nelfoos wrote:

Candidates from within in NZ I reckon would be

Ramon

Danny Hay

Neil Emblem

Brett Angell 

Angell would be a bigger shark show than Hudson

how do you make that out? OK he can be an idiot on the sideline (we used to call them characters) but his coaching ability is brilliant, he has basically had to build a new team each season at HBU and had bu55er all money to do it with, yet he has finished runners up and 4th and looks as if he has a team that will be there or thereabouts this season.

You’ve said it there, he can be a dick.  If he was AW coach, I can see him pissing so many off that Dyer would end up being the best player available for selection.

can't see that, he's well like by players, Paul Ifill described him as the best coach he'd ever played under. After the incident in Wellington last season, his players were pretty quick to jump to his defence - if he was someone that pi55ed them off they would have just stayed silent

Early retirement
3.1K
·
34K
·
over 17 years

There is no way in the world that Angells PowerPoint game is going to impress the corporate muppets that now run the game in this country.

Legend
13K
·
25K
·
over 9 years

Another AWs player speaking well of Hudson. One that wasn’t always picked either. Still what would he know I guess

http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/football/nz-teams/99129085/injury-cloud-still-hangs-over-all-whites-defender-storm-roux

tradition and history
1.5K
·
9.9K
·
over 17 years

Ex Aw's or even current ones are most unlikely to say anything in the press regarding  current coaches or past ones. It is more likely ( in fact you can guarantee it ) that they will voice their opinions to players in a social environment ( ie. pub or party )

Legend
7.8K
·
15K
·
about 17 years

Leggy wrote:

Ex Aw's or even current ones are most unlikely to say anything in the press regarding  current coaches or past ones. It is more likely ( in fact you can guarantee it ) that they will voice their opinions to players in a social environment ( ie. pub or party )

Or on half baked football forums

Marquee
1.2K
·
5.5K
·
almost 14 years

martinb wrote:

Leggy wrote:

Ex Aw's or even current ones are most unlikely to say anything in the press regarding  current coaches or past ones. It is more likely ( in fact you can guarantee it ) that they will voice their opinions to players in a social environment ( ie. pub or party )

Or on half baked football forums

Marquee
7.8K
·
9.7K
·
almost 14 years

I say see if Ramon will take a couple of years and do the Olympics then assess for the next World Cup qualifiers.

He could do ACFC at the same time.

Lawyerish
2.1K
·
5.1K
·
over 13 years

james dean wrote:

I've been thinking a bit about the future of the AWs on a reduced budget.  

Next two years the All Whites, for all intents and purposes, are the U23 team.  Spend all the money on the team for that tournamen.t  Run the AWs over a 2 year programme rather than a 4 year programme after the Olympics in 2020.

Someone who knows more about the schedule will be able to pick holes in this, but if we have a limited pot of cash why not spend it at the pointy end only?

I actually think this was one of Andy's bullet points in his first power point presentation (contact hours I believe was the terminology)

Trialist
57
·
150
·
over 7 years

james dean wrote:

Nelfoos wrote:

james dean wrote:

coochiee wrote:

With Wood we have a quality forward line. Without him we seriously don’t. Yes I think Hudson deserves criticism for only picking Brockie at the last minute in these playoff games, and not earlier against say Japan. If AH didn’t have faith in the likes of Bevan, Patterson, Smeltz to do a job in Woods absence he should have given Brockie a go earlier. He should have had a plan for a Wood injury. Though we are talking about a guy in Brocks with one AWs goal in 50 games.

All of these players are miles below Woods ability at the moment. You can add to that mix Kosta and Rojas. No combination of these players was seriously going to trouble Peru away. So yes Hudson had no plan B, but it’s also hard to polish a turd when playing a true quality side like the Peruvians.

Sure, but the question is has Hudson brought the team forwards?  And I question his approach in the away leg when I can't see how the team that he picked could actually score a goal

We were inches from scoring a couple of times. Wood should have and we should have had a penalty early on. The team Hudson put out had a couple of good chances, which is all we were ever going to get against a side like Peru. I have 0 qualms with how he set up, because I don't think there was any other option with a half fit Wood.

We had no shots on target in 180 minutes?

That is misreporting. What about Thomas shot that hit the post in the first leg. If it hits a post it has to be on target....... unless its the corner flag.
Getting paid to be here
730
·
980
·
almost 7 years

Ricardo wrote:

james dean wrote:

Nelfoos wrote:

james dean wrote:

coochiee wrote:

With Wood we have a quality forward line. Without him we seriously don’t. Yes I think Hudson deserves criticism for only picking Brockie at the last minute in these playoff games, and not earlier against say Japan. If AH didn’t have faith in the likes of Bevan, Patterson, Smeltz to do a job in Woods absence he should have given Brockie a go earlier. He should have had a plan for a Wood injury. Though we are talking about a guy in Brocks with one AWs goal in 50 games.

All of these players are miles below Woods ability at the moment. You can add to that mix Kosta and Rojas. No combination of these players was seriously going to trouble Peru away. So yes Hudson had no plan B, but it’s also hard to polish a turd when playing a true quality side like the Peruvians.

Sure, but the question is has Hudson brought the team forwards?  And I question his approach in the away leg when I can't see how the team that he picked could actually score a goal

We were inches from scoring a couple of times. Wood should have and we should have had a penalty early on. The team Hudson put out had a couple of good chances, which is all we were ever going to get against a side like Peru. I have 0 qualms with how he set up, because I don't think there was any other option with a half fit Wood.

We had no shots on target in 180 minutes?

That is misreporting. What about Thomas shot that hit the post in the first leg. If it hits a post it has to be on target....... unless its the corner flag.

The post is, quite literally, not the target. A shot on target is either a goal, or is saved. There none of those from the All Whites in this match (though, as others have noted, Wood did have two that were ruled out for fouls).

Starting XI
1.8K
·
4.1K
·
over 17 years

anfony's definitely the man

he got us into the opposition half on several occasions. we had several genuine chances to create chances. we nearly almost qualified.

sign him up before we lose him to amateur football 

LG
Legend
5.9K
·
24K
·
about 17 years

Ange for the All Whites? Media speculation/suggestion.

Getting paid to be here
730
·
980
·
almost 7 years

Lonegunmen wrote:

Ange for the All Whites? Media speculation/suggestion.

His next football job will be with a club.

WeeNix
410
·
920
·
over 11 years

Ricardo wrote:

james dean wrote:

Nelfoos wrote:

james dean wrote:

coochiee wrote:

With Wood we have a quality forward line. Without him we seriously don’t. Yes I think Hudson deserves criticism for only picking Brockie at the last minute in these playoff games, and not earlier against say Japan. If AH didn’t have faith in the likes of Bevan, Patterson, Smeltz to do a job in Woods absence he should have given Brockie a go earlier. He should have had a plan for a Wood injury. Though we are talking about a guy in Brocks with one AWs goal in 50 games.

All of these players are miles below Woods ability at the moment. You can add to that mix Kosta and Rojas. No combination of these players was seriously going to trouble Peru away. So yes Hudson had no plan B, but it’s also hard to polish a turd when playing a true quality side like the Peruvians.

Sure, but the question is has Hudson brought the team forwards?  And I question his approach in the away leg when I can't see how the team that he picked could actually score a goal

We were inches from scoring a couple of times. Wood should have and we should have had a penalty early on. The team Hudson put out had a couple of good chances, which is all we were ever going to get against a side like Peru. I have 0 qualms with how he set up, because I don't think there was any other option with a half fit Wood.

We had no shots on target in 180 minutes?

That is misreporting. What about Thomas shot that hit the post in the first leg. If it hits a post it has to be on target....... unless its the corner flag.

The post is, quite literally, not the target. A shot on target is either a goal, or is saved. There none of those from the All Whites in this match (though, as others have noted, Wood did have two that were ruled out for fouls).

Does it matter who saves the shot? if freekick hits wall is that on target? 

Marquee
1.2K
·
8.2K
·
about 17 years

james dean wrote:

I've been thinking a bit about the future of the AWs on a reduced budget.  

Next two years the All Whites, for all intents and purposes, are the U23 team.  Spend all the money on the team for that tournamen.t  Run the AWs over a 2 year programme rather than a 4 year programme after the Olympics in 2020.

Someone who knows more about the schedule will be able to pick holes in this, but if we have a limited pot of cash why not spend it at the pointy end only?

Wasn't that essentially the plan this cycle, but was scuppered by the eligibility saga?

Also, I don't think any player's feelings towards a manager are a particularly good proxy for how good they are at getting good results.

Trialist
57
·
150
·
over 7 years

Ricardo wrote:

james dean wrote:

Nelfoos wrote:

james dean wrote:

coochiee wrote:

With Wood we have a quality forward line. Without him we seriously don’t. Yes I think Hudson deserves criticism for only picking Brockie at the last minute in these playoff games, and not earlier against say Japan. If AH didn’t have faith in the likes of Bevan, Patterson, Smeltz to do a job in Woods absence he should have given Brockie a go earlier. He should have had a plan for a Wood injury. Though we are talking about a guy in Brocks with one AWs goal in 50 games.

All of these players are miles below Woods ability at the moment. You can add to that mix Kosta and Rojas. No combination of these players was seriously going to trouble Peru away. So yes Hudson had no plan B, but it’s also hard to polish a turd when playing a true quality side like the Peruvians.

Sure, but the question is has Hudson brought the team forwards?  And I question his approach in the away leg when I can't see how the team that he picked could actually score a goal

We were inches from scoring a couple of times. Wood should have and we should have had a penalty early on. The team Hudson put out had a couple of good chances, which is all we were ever going to get against a side like Peru. I have 0 qualms with how he set up, because I don't think there was any other option with a half fit Wood.

We had no shots on target in 180 minutes?

That is misreporting. What about Thomas shot that hit the post in the first leg. If it hits a post it has to be on target....... unless its the corner flag.

The post is, quite literally, not the target. A shot on target is either a goal, or is saved. There none of those from the All Whites in this match (though, as others have noted, Wood did have two that were ruled out for fouls).

Well I would argue that the Thomas shot had the goalkeeper beaten and but for the goalside of the post it would have been a goal. Saved ..... by the post.
Marquee
2.1K
·
8.2K
·
over 17 years

reg22 wrote:

anfony's definitely the man

he got us into the opposition half on several occasions. we had several genuine chances to create chances. we nearly almost qualified.

sign him up before we lose him to amateur football 

But, but Bielsa...Harry Redknapp...Mourinho...

First Team Squad
1.2K
·
1.2K
·
almost 10 years

Lonegunmen wrote:

Ange for the All Whites? Media speculation/suggestion.

His next football job will be with a club.

NZ Football is the biggest old boys club going, isn't it?

Starting XI
2.9K
·
2.6K
·
almost 9 years

Ricardo wrote:

Ricardo wrote:

james dean wrote:

Nelfoos wrote:

james dean wrote:

coochiee wrote:

With Wood we have a quality forward line. Without him we seriously don’t. Yes I think Hudson deserves criticism for only picking Brockie at the last minute in these playoff games, and not earlier against say Japan. If AH didn’t have faith in the likes of Bevan, Patterson, Smeltz to do a job in Woods absence he should have given Brockie a go earlier. He should have had a plan for a Wood injury. Though we are talking about a guy in Brocks with one AWs goal in 50 games.

All of these players are miles below Woods ability at the moment. You can add to that mix Kosta and Rojas. No combination of these players was seriously going to trouble Peru away. So yes Hudson had no plan B, but it’s also hard to polish a turd when playing a true quality side like the Peruvians.

Sure, but the question is has Hudson brought the team forwards?  And I question his approach in the away leg when I can't see how the team that he picked could actually score a goal

We were inches from scoring a couple of times. Wood should have and we should have had a penalty early on. The team Hudson put out had a couple of good chances, which is all we were ever going to get against a side like Peru. I have 0 qualms with how he set up, because I don't think there was any other option with a half fit Wood.

We had no shots on target in 180 minutes?

That is misreporting. What about Thomas shot that hit the post in the first leg. If it hits a post it has to be on target....... unless its the corner flag.

The post is, quite literally, not the target. A shot on target is either a goal, or is saved. There none of those from the All Whites in this match (though, as others have noted, Wood did have two that were ruled out for fouls).

Well I would argue that the Thomas shot had the goalkeeper beaten and but for the goalside of the post it would have been a goal. Saved ..... by the post.

Well you'd be wrong. Shots on target has an established definition.
Legend
13K
·
25K
·
over 9 years

Oska wrote:

Also, I don't think any player's feelings towards a manager are a particularly good proxy for how good they are at getting good results.

Have you ever played a team sport? If you have you will have known, when you have had a good coach, and when you have had a sharkhouse one. 

Players shouldn’t yes be the sole judge of a coach, but they are a very important one. No one on this forum, whether they rate Hudson or despise him, would come close to having the knowledge of Hudson’s coaching abilities as the actual AWs players of the last 3-4 years.

All of these guys are in pro football environments - some very high level - and will all have been exposed to good and bad gaffers. They will know whether AH was fit for the job or not. Now that he is highly likely leaving they (Brockie, Durante, Roux, Falloon etc) don’t have crawl up his arse if they don’t want to.

Opinion Privileges revoked
5.2K
·
10K
·
almost 15 years

I give it one year before this forum is full of

someone wrote:

god this new coach is sharkhouse, bring back anfony

Legend
3.7K
·
15K
·
over 17 years

2ndBest wrote:

Pretty much concur with what JD has said.

When Hudson came in he claimed “Our team will have a real emphasis on being positive going forward and makes the most of the qualities of the players available for selection”. But playing Wood as a target man really blunted up attacking wise. Almost all of his goals at club level are him poaching 6-9 yards from goals with balls coming in from wingers. Yet we played mostly with two up front with Rojas running off his shoulder. You could argue we were more defensive than Herbert was, and he was publicly panned for that at times. At least under Herbert’s team we create one or two shots a game. Arguably our attacking stocks his cycle are better than the 2010 cycle. Yet we look far worse.

Even looking back at Hudson’s record pre-All Whites, there is a pretty similar pattern. Defensively strongly, but poor attacking.

Real Maryland 2008 – 24 goals in 23 games
Real Maryland 2009 – 19 goals in 22 games
Newport 2010/11 – 18 goals in 6 games
Newport 2011/12 – 13 goals in 12 games
Bahrain U23s – 14 goals in 10 games
Bahrain – 6 goals in 12 games
NZ U23s – 8 goals in 4 games
NZ – 32 goals in 27 games

And off those 32 goals, 20 of them were scored against OFC nations either at home or at a neutral ground. We only scored 4 goals against OFC at their home ground (and only one once in those 4 games).

We never scored more than one goal against a non-OFC nation, and while sure we played some good sides, we should have been doing better against teams like Uzbekistan, China, Thailand, Myanmar, Oman and Belarus. We probably should have lost our only away win against a non-OFC.

So while on the face of it, he got us within 90 minutes from the WC, that really should be a par mark. 2-0 loss looks ok on the books (and wiki), but once you look at the entire circle, it’s all be pretty average. My real question is did he get more than you’d expect from the players at hand with the resources at hand. I don’t think he did.

Pretty decent analysis imo

Legend
3.7K
·
15K
·
over 17 years

Hard News wrote:

That's a massive claim.  There has been no evidence at all to suggest Gallop and Lowy are in any way smarter than that.

Absolute gold

Early retirement
3.1K
·
34K
·
over 17 years
Legend
3.7K
·
15K
·
over 17 years

james dean wrote:

I've been thinking a bit about the future of the AWs on a reduced budget.  

Next two years the All Whites, for all intents and purposes, are the U23 team.  Spend all the money on the team for that tournamen.t  Run the AWs over a 2 year programme rather than a 4 year programme after the Olympics in 2020.

Someone who knows more about the schedule will be able to pick holes in this, but if we have a limited pot of cash why not spend it at the pointy end only?

Smart. I like this. 

Marquee
970
·
6.5K
·
over 11 years

It'll be Danny Hay.

Surge
·
Can I have some lungs please miss
1.1K
·
7.5K
·
almost 17 years
WeeNix
350
·
770
·
over 17 years

Don't let the door hit your arse on the way out Anthony and can you take that oxygen thief Martin with you please?

Starting XI
1.8K
·
4.1K
·
over 17 years
Jag
Not Elite enough
730
·
8K
·
over 17 years
Legend
2.6K
·
17K
·
over 17 years

Never lost to OFC opposition.

An achievement for the ages that one.

WeeNix
350
·
770
·
over 17 years

Barely won against any of them either.  Smug Twit.

Moar stars
2.1K
·
4.8K
·
over 12 years
First Team Squad
280
·
1.6K
·
over 12 years

Jerzy Merino wrote:

It'll be Danny Hay.

no it won't be

You’ll need an account to join the conversation!

Sign in Sign up