General Football Discussion

Paraguay vs Spain

69 replies · 20,651 views
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
loyalgunner wrote:

Buffon II wrote:

loyalgunner wrote:
Spain were the better side, though not by a lot - far from convincing.� Think Paraguay can feel hard done by.� Incredible encroachment on Cardozo's penalty - should've been allowed to take it again.� Do the Spanish players not know the rule?
To be fair now, Fabregas was clearly taken out by Villar and should of had another penalty, so it all evened itself out.Spain will probably get done by Germany on this form, but i'd like to see them win for Saint Iker. He deserves a World Cup medal, basically because he is the best keeper in football over the last 20 years.
Fair enough but that doesn't really account for the goal ruled out for offside.� And let's be honest, if the ref had spotted the encroachment and let the penalty be retaken, regardless of whether or not it went in, the odds of things playing out exactly as it did with Spain getting a penalty and Fabregas being brought down are very slim indeed.


The Paraguay 'goal' was correctly disallowed - Cardozo was offside when the cross came in, and he was certainly actively involved in the play during the entire move. Ergo, no goal.

The ref was a bit weird - think he got the offside/penalty calls spot on, but was weird how he spotted one encroachment and not the other. Maybe he'd been alerted to it after the first peno. Yeah, Fabregas was taken out by Villar, that should have been a peno too. Also, probably should have sent Santana off for the elbow on Busquets. And the best Paraguay chance late in the game came after Iniesta got chopped down in the Paraguay half and looked on incredulously as the play continued.

As for the game, I can't believe how del Bosque can't (or refuses) to see that Torres is just holding his side back. Spain have looked much, much better both times Torres came off in the last two games, and only took charge of the games after that. So del Bosque, grow some and drop him. You can't play guys into form in the closing stages of a World Cup.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Downey26 wrote:
im glad spains winner didnt come from the penalty, clear dive from villa, there was mild contact between the 2 but no foul whatsoever, well imo anyway.

�

�


No foul? Clear dive? He first got pulled back, and then the guy ran into his legs from behind. Two fouls really.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
EG, agree with basically all of that. The problem for del Bosque, is that Torres can produce one moment of magic that can change a game- something that Llorente doesn't quite have. However, I'm really only defending Nando. He's been awful. Hardly done anything good at all. He never plays well with Spain because the Spanish style doesn't play to his strengths. And all they would do is put Villa up front and play Cesc or Silva or something, not Llorente. But I want Torres to score. But all good, as long as Villa keeps doing it.
 
But Torres deserves to be dropped.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
el grapadura wrote:
Downey26 wrote:
im glad spains winner didnt come from the penalty, clear dive from villa, there was mild contact between the 2 but no foul whatsoever, well imo anyway.

 

 


No foul? Clear dive? He first got pulled back, and then the guy ran into his legs from behind. Two fouls really.
 
well maybe my eyes let me down, was pretty tired but from what i remember there was just the usual jostling for the ball, seemed very soft to me
 
 
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Yeah, I know that del Bosque is hoping Torres will come right and give him something special, but I think he's making a huge risk wasting 60 minutes of a game waiting for something that's unlikely to happen. The problem also is that with Torres on the field Iniesta doesn't have as much space to exploit in the attacking third, and has to drop a bit deeper which makes it easier to defend against him.

Good 30 minutes worked against Portugal and Paraguay, but may not be enough against the Germans.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Downey26 wrote:
el grapadura wrote:
Downey26 wrote:

im glad spains winner didnt come from the penalty, clear dive from villa, there was mild contact between the 2 but no foul whatsoever, well imo anyway.

�

�
No foul? Clear dive? He first got pulled back, and then the guy ran into his legs from behind. Two fouls really.

�
well maybe my eyes let me down, was pretty tired but from what i remember there was just the usual jostling for the ball, seemed very soft to me

�

�


Villa was well in front of the Paraguayan defender, who tried to pull him back and eventually ran into his legs from behind and took him down.el grapadura2010-07-04 12:52:12
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
el grapadura wrote:
Yeah, I know that del Bosque is hoping Torres will come right and give him something special, but I think he's making a huge risk wasting 60 minutes of a game waiting for something that's unlikely to happen. The problem also is that with Torres on the field Iniesta doesn't have as much space to exploit in the attacking third, and has to drop a bit deeper which makes it easier to defend against him.

Good 30 minutes worked against Portugal and Paraguay, but may not be enough against the Germans.
 
Yeah, this is true. It will be interesting to see if he drops him. There was never going to be much space for Torres to run into against Paraguay either, so it was hardly a game which he could really play well.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Great second half to the game. First half, not so much.

Spain is yet to put together a performance that shows they can compete with Germany. They've certainly got the players, but I think they've got to lift their game to make the final.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Downey26 wrote:
el grapadura wrote:
Downey26 wrote:
im glad spains winner didnt come from the penalty, clear dive from villa, there was mild contact between the 2 but no foul whatsoever, well imo anyway.

 

 


No foul? Clear dive? He first got pulled back, and then the guy ran into his legs from behind. Two fouls really.
 
well maybe my eyes let me down, was pretty tired but from what i remember there was just the usual jostling for the ball, seemed very soft to me
 
 
Yeah you mustve been tired . Clear penalty mate.

Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
As for Paraguays disallowed goal for offside. It was possibly a little harsh,but probably fair. The ref ruled that the player in the offside position jumped for the ball,putting pressure or even causing the defender (I forget who) to miss the ball which then fell at the feet of the onside striker.
 
What also bugged me was the commentator after 3mins of injury time,going on and on about how the ref hadn't blown the whistle. Had he forgotten the 2min injury break that occured at the start of injury time? Sheesh

Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
There wasn't just the tiniest infringement in the first attempt of the Spanish penalty, the commentator said that "one player half a foot in the box", did he not notice the 3 Spanish players in the D when the penalty was taken! It's not just the penalty box that is 10 yds from the penalty spot, stupid commentator!

When Hibs, went up, to win the Scottish Cup - I wisnae there - furfuxake!

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I don't know why everyone (including the TV commentator) is saying the encroachment on Xabi Alonso's first penalty was minor. 
 
There are Spanish players well inside the penalty arc, which is encroachment.  In fact, that's the sole reason the penalty arc is there; to keep players the required distance (10 yards) from the penalty spot when a penalty is being taken.
 
It seems everyone is looking at who is inside the box, rather than the arc.
 
EDIT: Snap Ginger - great minds mate.
liverpoolfan12010-07-04 16:17:53
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
As a side note, the Spanish team doctor (or whoever it was treating the Spanish defender in the 90th min) is probably the first team medic at this level of football that i've seen treating a player without latex gloves in about 15 years

When Hibs, went up, to win the Scottish Cup - I wisnae there - furfuxake!

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Ah yeah had forgotten about the penalty encroachment. They really need to teach commentators basic rules before letting them loose on rants like a few times in that game...

Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Tegal wrote:
Ah yeah had forgotten about the penalty encroachment. They really need to teach commentators basic rules before letting them loose on rants like a few times in that game...
 
That particular commentator is a real bugbear for me. He's been ruining WC commentaries for years and years with that horribly bucolic, chirpy, patronising delivery. It's like they took some village greengrocer out of his shop and stuck him front of a mic. Should be doing lawn bowls or funny voices for children's cartoons. I groan in despair whenever he comes on.
 
Anyway, carry on.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
ginger_eejit wrote:
There wasn't just the tiniest infringement in the first attempt of the Spanish penalty, the commentator said that "one player half a foot in the box", did he not notice the 3 Spanish players in the D when the penalty was taken! It's not just the penalty box that is 10 yds from the penalty spot, stupid commentator!


Yeah that annoyed me.  They'd encroached by metres.  The commentator was a muppet.

With regards to the disallowed goal, personally (from memory of the replay) I didn't think the Paraguayan player who was offside had much to do with it.  He jumped for the ball, yes, but didn't touch it and none of the Spaniards around him seemed near it or looked like they'd have got it had he not been there.  If anything it would have put off his own player.  Like I said, though, that's just my memory and chances are next time I see it it'll be completely different.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
loyalgunner wrote:

Buffon II wrote:
If you are in any doubt as to whom you should support in this match:This woman (Larissa Riquelme) says she will strip a la Maradona if Paraguay win the cup.
Right screw Germany, let's hope Paraguay win.� She's gorgeous.


Oh well, maybe just a flash of mammaries?

"Phoenix till they lose"

Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion. 

Genuine opinion: FTFFA

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Do you know San Iker was pointing to Reina after he saved the penalty? Dedicated it to the wonderful man that is Pepe Reina because he had told Casillas that Cardozo would shoot that way. Hero.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
loyalgunner wrote:

ginger_eejit wrote:
There wasn't just the tiniest infringement in the first attempt of the Spanish penalty, the commentator said that "one player half a foot in the box", did he not notice the 3 Spanish players in the D when the penalty was taken! It's not just the penalty box that is 10 yds from the penalty spot, stupid commentator!
Yeah that annoyed me.� They'd encroached by metres.� The commentator was a muppet.With regards to the disallowed goal, personally (from memory of the replay) I didn't think the Paraguayan player who was offside had much to do with it.� He jumped for the ball, yes, but didn't touch it and none of the Spaniards around him seemed near it or looked like they'd have got it had he not been there.� If anything it would have put off his own player.� Like I said, though, that's just my memory and chances are next time I see it it'll be completely different.


LG, I know you hate Spain, but you're fighting a losing battle here. Cardozo is in an offside position (quite clearly) as the cross is coming in. He then goes to meet the cross and challenges for the ball in the air, which instantly means he's actively involved in the play having come from an offside position. The AR's flag goes up immediately at this point, and anything else that happens afterwards is completely irrelevant, because the officials will award an indirect fre kick to the defending team for the offside offence.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Watched the replay and fair enough, Cardozo's opponents were a lot closer to him then I'd remembered and his being there and trying to get to the ball constitute an offside under the 'interfering with an opponent' part of the offside section in the Laws of the Game.  I still don't think that leaping for the ball from an offside position is in itself an offence. loyalgunner2010-07-05 10:31:46
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
loyalgunner wrote:

� I still don't think that leaping for the ball from an offside position is in itself an offence.


But it is - an attempt to play the ball from an offside position (whether on the ground or in the air) from an offside position constitutes an offside offence.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Anyone notice the attack/scramble on the left hand side of the goa in the second halfl, Villa dribbles close to the left goalpost, goes to pass which is intercepted by a Paraguayan falling over.
 
He actually falls on the ball, then scoops the ball out with his arm.
 
Even Villa missed it, went for a Spanish corner. Would have been a Penalty otherwise for sure.
 
Both matches were entertaining for sure!
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
el grapadura wrote:
loyalgunner wrote:

  I still don't think that leaping for the ball from an offside position is in itself an offence.


But it is - an attempt to play the ball from an offside position (whether on the ground or in the air) from an offside position constitutes an offside offence.


Admittedly I haven't finished reading the latest copy of the Laws of the Game so I'm prepared to be proven wrong, but I have covered the whole offside section so think I am safe to disagree.  All it says is:

'A player in an offside position is only penalised if, at the moment the ball touches or is played by one of his team, he is, in the opinion of the referee, involved in active play by:
- interfering with play or
- interfering with an opponent or
- gaining an advantage by being in that position'

I certainly can see how a ref could interpret a player making a go at the ball (and failing) from an offside position as being offside, but in every case certainly not.

I mean, say there was a breakaway.  Team A is 1-0 up in the 93rd minute and Team B have a corner and have pushed all 11 players up in and around the opposition penalty area.  Their corner fails so someone in Team A gathers the ball and passes forward to where he sees two players.  One is in his own half and one isn't.  The one not in his half leaps to head the ball but misses by a solid foot and a bit but the guy from his own half runs past, gathers the ball, and scores.  Would you call that offside?  I seriously doubt many refs would but by what you're saying it must be.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Well, that's a higly hypothetical scenario that would pretty much never happen in a game.

The point being is that attempting to play the ball from an offside position generally means 1) interefering in the play, and 2) interfering with an opponent.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
He deserves to get a IFK awarded against him for being stupid enough to be in an offside position when there was no defence to play him onside

When Hibs, went up, to win the Scottish Cup - I wisnae there - furfuxake!

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
If he hadn't of jumped for the ball,the defender wouldn't have challenged. The defender instead wouldve been under less pressure and stepped back to get a touch instead of challenging.
 
Like i said,harsh,but probably right. Couldve gone either way i guess.

Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
el grapadura wrote:


The ref was a bit weird - think he got the offside/penalty calls spot on, but was weird how he spotted one encroachment and not the other. Maybe he'd been alerted to it after the first peno.
 
I wondered about that too. The encroachment by the defence on Paraguay's penalty was much bigger than the one he spotted with Spain's penalty.
 
That passage of play provided some amazing entertainment!
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
StopOut wrote:
Tegal wrote:
Ah yeah had forgotten about the penalty encroachment. They really need to teach commentators basic rules before letting them loose on rants like a few times in that game...
 
That particular commentator is a real bugbear for me. He's been ruining WC commentaries for years and years with that horribly bucolic, chirpy, patronising delivery. It's like they took some village greengrocer out of his shop and stuck him front of a mic. Should be doing lawn bowls or funny voices for children's cartoons. I groan in despair whenever he comes on.
 
Anyway, carry on.
 
Both the commentators are awful. I think part of the problem is that they have to commentate solo, so there's no-one to intervene when they go off spouting bollocks. They're the same commentators Sky gave us for the U17s World Cup matches and they haven't improved any.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

yeah, the spain para commentator is terrible. been irritating me all tournie. boring, obvious (often wrong), kinda patronising, generally innane comments.

and how could that valdez goal not be offside? the guy who jumped for the header was obviously in offside position and had to be interfering with play (yet that didnt even occur to the commentator as a possibility!)

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Buffon II wrote:
If you are in any doubt as to whom you should support in this match:This woman (Larissa Riquelme) says she will strip a la Maradona if Paraguay win the cup.


I went to school with an exchange student who use to play in our first XI and after the went back home he became a model and today�he posted pictures on his facebook of himself�with this lovely lady...topless�before a photoshoot�(her). I'm his new best friend.TopLeft072010-07-06 14:55:31

Fuck this stupid game

Permalink Permalink