Current version

Posted January 24, 2025 00:20 · last edited January 24, 2025 00:22

I thought the coach had gone on record as saying it wasn't the disciplinary issues and rather due to a lack of progress on Garbett's part.

Could just be PR, but it's also pretty clear cut statement from the coach


Carl Hoefkens (Breda coach): “It is a decision that has not been taken lightly. For me it was taken on the basis of returns on the football field. We want to continue to take the next steps in certain positions. Matthew has a lot of potential but I don’t think his development has been sufficient since the start of the season. And I want to make it clear once again that I have no problem with him. Of course I think he is a top guy. But purely football, in his position, it has been insufficient for me so far.”

Previous versions

3 versions
Unknown editor edited January 24, 2025 00:22
I thought the coach had gone on record as saying it wasn't the disciplinary issues and rather due to a lack of progress on Garbett's part.

Could just be PR, but it's also pretty clear cut stayement from the coach


Carl Hoefkens (Breda coach): “It is a decision that has not been taken lightly. For me it was taken on the basis of returns on the football field. We want to continue to take the next steps in certain positions. Matthew has a lot of potential but I don’t think his development has been sufficient since the start of the season. And I want to make it clear once again that I have no problem with him. Of course I think he is a top guy. But purely football, in his position, it has been insufficient for me so far.”
Unknown editor edited January 24, 2025 00:21
I thought the coach had gone on record as saying it wasn't the disciplinary issues and rather due to a lack of progress on Garbett's part.
Unknown editor edited January 24, 2025 00:20
I thought the coach had gone on record as saying it wasn't the disciplinary issues?