nope, from the reply I've watched is going over the stumps. there is noway Haddin can have seen the ball hit the stumps the fingers of his gloves made contact as he caught the ball - umpires should have called it a no ball as Haddins gloves were in front of the wickets when the ball was delivered = no ball.
Current version
Posted February 02, 2009 04:44 · last edited March 18, 2021 07:28
nope, from the reply I've watched is going over the stumps. there is noway Haddin can have seen the ball hit the stumps the fingers of his gloves made contact as he caught the ball - umpires should have called it a no ball as Haddins gloves were in front of the wickets when the ball was delivered = no ball.