Current version

Posted December 06, 2009 23:38 · last edited March 18, 2021 07:28

bopman wrote:
This time last year I would have said Wagner was a shoe in, hasn't quite been the same bowler this year but agree would be nice to add some variety to the attack. But in saying that in 2-3 years time our pace attack will likely include Boult and Arnel both of whom are left armers I think.
 
Arnel would be a bit past it in a couple years time wouldnt he? Super nice guy though but i just think he may have "peaked" a little too late to be given a seriuos opportunity at international level. Boult i like but his off field and sometimes on feild attitude need sorting out, but that can come with maturity etc.
 
Anyway prob not the best time to be talkin about our bowling, the one good thing we got going at the moment.
 
Batting, its hard to disagree with much of what has been said, I had similar ideas to downey with Watling and Broom in for timmac and fulton, from vettoris comments it sounds like sinclair and how would be doubtful, he mentioned a few names and seemed to be intent on not mentioning them,
If what was said about those cantabury guys not gettin on with sinclair are true then same coule be for dan as he was well schooled by most of those guys too.
I get the feeling the selectors wont be too brash on changes, fulton will go, thats for sure but after that im not sure, Timmac you would think but i wouldnt be surprised to see only one change.
 
My thoughts anyway.

Previous versions

1 version
Unknown editor edited March 18, 2021 07:28
bopman wrote:
This time last year I would have said Wagner was a shoe in, hasn't quite been the same bowler this year but agree would be nice to add some variety to the attack. But in saying that in 2-3 years time our pace attack will likely include Boult and Arnel both of whom are left armers I think.
 
Arnel would be a bit past it in a couple years time wouldnt he? Super nice guy though but i just think he may have "peaked" a little too late to be given a seriuos opportunity at international level. Boult i like but his off field and sometimes on feild attitude need sorting out, but that can come with maturity etc.
 
Anyway prob not the best time to be talkin about our bowling, the one good thing we got going at the moment.
 
Batting, its hard to disagree with much of what has been said, I had similar ideas to downey with Watling and Broom in for timmac and fulton, from vettoris comments it sounds like sinclair and how would be doubtful, he mentioned a few names and seemed to be intent on not mentioning them,
If what was said about those cantabury guys not gettin on with sinclair are true then same coule be for dan as he was well schooled by most of those guys too.
I get the feeling the selectors wont be too brash on changes, fulton will go, thats for sure but after that im not sure, Timmac you would think but i wouldnt be surprised to see only one change.
 
My thoughts anyway.