I agree, the Lance Armstrong comparison is a valid one. Hence why his public and front foot defense is easy to understand. He's convinced himself he's not guilty and he believes, for whatever reason, that he has enough evidence in his favour and in reverse, not enough against him.
I agree, the Lance Armstrong comparison is a valid one. Hence why his public and front foot defense is easy to understand. He's convinced himself he's not guilty and he believes, for whatever reason, that he has enough evidence in his favour and in reverse, not enough against him.