Current version

Posted May 23, 2014 23:57 · last edited March 18, 2021 07:29

Arsenal wrote:
aitkenmike wrote:
detoxin wrote:

Have people's opinion changed about Vincent now that it's come out he doesn't have immunity?

The question is whether he will face criminal charges - a possibility given he fixed games in the UK.


Not sure this is correct. According to the Guardian:

"The ECB has laid 14 charges against Vincent arising from Sussex’s defeats by Lancashire in a T20 quarter final and by Kent in a 40-over match, both at Hove and both televised. Arif has been charged with six offences in relation to the Kent game. But that could only lead to cricketing sanctions – almost certainly a life ban, if found guilty – because match-fixing is not a criminal offence in this country, unlike in New Zealand. The ECB’s chairman Giles Clarke has reaffirmed this week that he would like that situation to change."

https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2014/may/23/lou-vincent-cricket


I take it back then, I thought it was a criminal offence there, but obviously not.  If thats the case then anyone suggesting a plea bargain was an idiot - there is no way the cricket authorities can not ban him for life and still retain any credibility in the fight against the corruption in the game at the moment.

Previous versions

1 version
Unknown editor edited March 18, 2021 07:29
Arsenal wrote:
aitkenmike wrote:
detoxin wrote:

Have people's opinion changed about Vincent now that it's come out he doesn't have immunity?

The question is whether he will face criminal charges - a possibility given he fixed games in the UK.


Not sure this is correct. According to the Guardian:

"The ECB has laid 14 charges against Vincent arising from Sussex’s defeats by Lancashire in a T20 quarter final and by Kent in a 40-over match, both at Hove and both televised. Arif has been charged with six offences in relation to the Kent game. But that could only lead to cricketing sanctions – almost certainly a life ban, if found guilty – because match-fixing is not a criminal offence in this country, unlike in New Zealand. The ECB’s chairman Giles Clarke has reaffirmed this week that he would like that situation to change."

http://www.theguardian.com/sport/2014/may/23/lou-vincent-cricket


I take it back then, I thought it was a criminal offence there, but obviously not.  If thats the case then anyone suggesting a plea bargain was an idiot - there is no way the cricket authorities can not ban him for life and still retain any credibility in the fight against the corruption in the game at the moment.