Surprised there's no talk/debate here about the ODI team. Seams like there's a few unpopular decisions amongst fans. I like it but probably wouldn't have complained too much if it was Henry over Milne and Neesham over Elliot but can see why they went with that 15. It's a good thing having depth anyway and with nine games between now and then I highly doubt we won't see at least one injury.
No real issues for me at all. The only thing I would have changed is have Henry over Milne, and maybe Watling over Latham, but that last one was never going to happen.
The only issue I would have had is if they had of not taken Mills. I think the public at large completely ignore just how good he has been over the last few years. In this country a lot of the public are FAR to quick to want to push experienced players out the door because they are 'too old' in pretty much all sports.