Posted March 18, 2015 20:17 · last edited March 18, 2021 07:29
I laughed at last nights commentary "Sri Lanka have had such a good world cup"
Um.... They are ranked 5th so suggests they should not make the semis, which they did not. The beat everyone in their group ranked below them (ENG, BANG, SCO, AFG) and lost to those ranked higher (AU, NZ). How does this equate to a good world cup? They did exactly as they should have done. You could say Sangakkara had a good world cup...
I laughed at last nights commentary "Sri Lanka have had such a good world cup"
Um.... They are ranked 5th so suggests they should not make the semis, which they did not. The beat everyone in their group ranked below them (ENG, BANG, SCO, AFG) and lost to those ranked higher (AU, NZ). How does this equate to a good world cup? They did exactly as they should have done. You could say Sangakkara had a good world cup...