Current version

Posted March 17, 2016 00:57 · last edited March 18, 2021 07:29

liberty_nz wrote:
LeighboNZ wrote:

About to select the MVP for our cricket team...thoughts?

Player #1 - 347 runs, 21 wickets, 5 catches

Player #2 - 437 runs, 10 catches

Player #3 - 200 runs, 24 wickets, 6 catches

Aside from the stats can you point to any of the performances being match winning/saving?

i.e. was player 3's 5 wicket haul match winning? Did player 2 save the match with a disciplined 2nd innings 50 in testing conditions?

I think it sometimes needs more than just the numbers - context can be useful.

Based on the numbers though, looks like a close race. 

Think about Guptil's test average without Zimbabwe.

Kane's hundred(s?) in India are worth more than a big score against Zimbabwe.

That said it is possible you are just showing off about how awesome your team is! 3 way split?

Previous versions

1 version
Unknown editor edited March 18, 2021 07:29
liberty_nz wrote:
LeighboNZ wrote:

About to select the MVP for our cricket team...thoughts?

Player #1 - 347 runs, 21 wickets, 5 catches

Player #2 - 437 runs, 10 catches

Player #3 - 200 runs, 24 wickets, 6 catches

Aside from the stats can you point to any of the performances being match winning/saving?

i.e. was player 3's 5 wicket haul match winning? Did player 2 save the match with a disciplined 2nd innings 50 in testing conditions?

I think it sometimes needs more than just the numbers - context can be useful.

Based on the numbers though, looks like a close race. 

Think about Guptil's test average without Zimbabwe.

Kane's hundred(s?) in India are worth more than a big score against Zimbabwe.

That said it is possible you are just showing off about how awesome your team is! 3 way split?