Agenda = Justice for penny pinching points during the season ( by questionable CF process some suggest ).
Live by the sword sorta stuff....
More importantly common sense or using CF statement - "the fundamental concerns of fairness". Why should one club be accommodated at the expense of all others.
So you want some sort of revenge against teams who gained points from other teams who broke the rules? Is NW the only club you seek to bring to justice or are you going to hunt down all teams who won protests?
I hope when you read back your post you will realise how ridiculous it is.
Also please expand on your statement about 'questionable process' I'd like to understand why the process was questionable?
Easy, the Capital Football board made the decision after considering all the information including the circumstances surrounding BNUs game against Miramar and feedback from NZ Football.
Now you tell me about the 'questionable process' you say protest decisions were made under last season?
question how dose the circumstances of the Brooklyn VS Mirimar game have anything to do with this whole situation????
i think this is a separate matter and has been ruled on and is accepted and is not being disputed by anyone so is now closed.
So what are the Circumstances, to make the Capital football board consider the Circumstances of this closed ruling, and then cause the Capital Footballs board to make the initial decision it did of 11 teams? As it seems there first statement of reason is not acceptable as the NZFA ruling seems to show.
The one bit i understand is the changing of the rules because the NZFA told them they were free to do so at the end of the judgement they made.
And the last question is why would someone what to thank someone for the consideration/decision on a matter/case when you have no matters present for considering ?
Perhaps the answers lie in the minutes of the board meetings as this discussion to have 11 and 9 team leagues must of been done at a meeting?
As for QUESTIONABLE PROCESS for protests i think it is pretty clear as to what officially is required by way of paper trail in the rules when it comes to a official protest being made and executed by all parties involved.
You can testify too this by looking at how you executed your protest on university of which NZFA confirmed under appeal was to the rules as laid out for 2013……
i think Retired lefty was meaning he didn't know exactly what these rules were and that if many others also didn't know the finer points of the process there could be a chance of this process becoming a bit of a mess maybe ?