WeeNix
57
·
760
·
over 16 years
Smithy wrote:
Loftus Road wrote:

Smithy says refs live in a bubble and their decisions are never challenged.

I rather thought there are lots of assessors at lots of games taking lots of

notes, and I understand they are fairly tough when it comes to pointing out errors.


Umm if the only review and feedback you're getting is from your own chums I would say that is the definition of life in a bubble.


What's wrong with a good old fashioned 360 degree review like folks have in the workplace? Get opinions from players, coaches and other referees?


I think judging the system like this is a bit short-sighted. I personally know an assessor who has failed 80% of refs attempting to get their NZ badge as they aren't at the standard.
Yes there are some poorer refs, but we can't expect quality at the top without protecting refs. It's a bit rich saying thin skinned, when refs fear for their safety and stress out before a game. Instead of going to enjoy it like most players want to.
Ultimately surely the idea that players need to take more responsibility for their actions can't be seen as a bad thing?
and 1 other
Appiah without the pace
6.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years
Smithy wrote:
2ndBest wrote:

As far as I'm aware, no one has been banned for 4 weeks for saying 'fucking hell ref'.

 


Correct. But that is what a "zero tolerance policy" requires. Which is what you've been advocating for isn't it?

No. I think there are two points. 
There is the use of swear words. Which in the right context doesn't really bother me. People drop in f bombs all the time so saying fucking hell ref after being bobsleded I think is (generally) fine.
The second is the use of insulting/abusive/offensive language. Calling a ref blind, a carnt, or a donkey, etc I think is unacceptable.
Add the two together and it probably makes it seem worse. 
Appiah without the pace
6.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years
terminator_x wrote:

Look, this situation is obviously getting a bit out of hand so as someone who is funny as fuck I am prepared to do my civic duty and form a Volunteer Banter Squad. Similar to Neighbourhood Watch we will patrol the region's football grounds and clubrooms with the aim of intervening early in situations of questionable banter before things escalate out of control. If we hear any shit banter or even observe a situation where banter is likely to occur we will jump in and offer best practice banter advice & guidance to the banterers so that the optimal banter outcomes can be achieved. We might even print pre-prepared banter sheets and hand them out before games.

Frankie Mac won't be happy
Appiah without the pace
6.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years

Word from the CEO

Hi everyone,

I would expect  that you’re probably pretty much over me & my musings about inappropriate behaviour but it’s important & its time (probably well overdue) that a stand was taken & we’re at that moment as of now.

I cannot stress enough that it is totally within all of your power to do something about this & I strongly believe that we all owe it to the kids who watch (& then imitate) behaviour that they see. Capital Football will not be taking any backward steps, we’ve started something & will follow this to wherever it ends up & however long it takes.

I have enjoyed getting out & about most weekends; some of the football I have witnessed has been great to watch. Many of you have taken the opportunity to “bend my ear” as to your particular point of view & although not agreeing with everything I am told it’s good that you feel able to do so & I thank you for that.

As you are aware Jamie Cross has left CF & his operations role has been split between Matt Snaddon, Robert Johnson & Lisa Jones. We won’t get it all correct in the initial period but I am confident that we’ll do it well & that you will all be satisfied with our continued service. We will review how’s it’s going (including a club survey) at the end of the season before making a decision on what the best process is for 2015.

You will shortly see a few “left-field” options coming your clubs way for them to comment upon via the Advisory Group process as we look to experiment with a bit of fresh thinking around expanding football throughout the year. In simple terms by offering what we do now, we know what we’ve got…kids & adults football numbers are pretty flat albeit there is still strong growth within the girls game. Some of the “stuff” that we will try over the next while won’t work, I’ll guarantee that, howver we are of the opinion that to “grow the game” we need to do a few things differently, watch this space.

Thanks for all that you are doing for football in the region; I do think we are making significant progress in all areas of the business & that is down to all of you.

Cheers,

RR


Tegal
·
Head Sleuth
3K
·
19K
·
about 17 years

I sense impending shambles

Marquee
2.1K
·
8.2K
·
over 17 years

When I was playing in Dunedin they for about half a season instituted a zero tolerance policy against swearing.  So all swearing was an automatic red.  You can imagine the shambles.  Team ending up with 9, players missing the target, swearing to themselves and then getting reds. The whole thing was just chaotic 

Marquee
2.1K
·
8.2K
·
over 17 years
Smithy wrote:
2ndBest wrote:
Feverish wrote:
2ndBest wrote:

Isn't all this about players taking responsibility for their actions? Stop being a dick and you won't get suspended. Pretty simple.

perhaps ban any speaking at football pitches? 

Stop being a dickhead and launch an argument for why you should be able to abuse refs. If that is what you truly believe.

 


I think Greenie's point (if he has one) is that there is a distinction to be drawn between saying something mildly sweary to an official, and abuse.


For example, currently what you've said above ("stop being a dick") would get you a four week ban. But you've used it in every day conversation, as we all do, so that 4 weeks off seems a bit ridiculous.


Nobody is arguing that you should be able to get up in a ref's face and abuse him (like I did...) or chase him to the changing rooms (like Declan). But saying to a linesman in the heat of the moment "come on mate are you fucking blind" is hardly a 4 week ban offence is it?


If that linesman turned around and said "fuck off mate you can't see anything from where you're sitting" then fair play to him too. 


I mean, how thin skinned can you be?


What I don't get is why referees care so much about what a player thinks of a decision.  The best refs just ignore all that rubbish, they're the ones with the whistle, they're making the decisions and they really don't get worked up about it.  They just get on with the game.  It's when you think that a referee cares that you're more likely to have a go (and I have been guilty of some referee baiting in my time I freely admit, which I am not that proud of).  

The good refs truly do not give a toss about what some spotty 21 year old (yes I was spotty as a 21 year old) is saying to them.  I don't think players should be abusing refs but nor do I think any of what has been described here constitutes "abusing refs"
Starting XI
24
·
3K
·
over 17 years
2ndBest wrote:

The second is the use of insulting/abusive/offensive language. Calling a ref blind, a carnt, or a donkey, etc I think is unacceptable.


Is telling the truth insulting/abusive/offensive?

Marquee
2.1K
·
8.2K
·
over 17 years
nightz wrote:
2ndBest wrote:

The second is the use of insulting/abusive/offensive language. Calling a ref blind, a carnt, or a donkey, etc I think is unacceptable.


Is telling the truth insulting/abusive/offensive?


Is calling someone blind really abusive?
Marquee
1.1K
·
7.6K
·
almost 13 years
nightz wrote:
2ndBest wrote:

The second is the use of insulting/abusive/offensive language. Calling a ref blind, a carnt, or a donkey, etc I think is unacceptable.


Is telling the truth insulting/abusive/offensive?

Iit is discrimination - Bigger NO NO than swearing 
Legend
2.1K
·
16K
·
over 17 years

Is an 11 team league offensive?

Appiah without the pace
6.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years
james dean wrote:
nightz wrote:
2ndBest wrote:

The second is the use of insulting/abusive/offensive language. Calling a ref blind, a carnt, or a donkey, etc I think is unacceptable.


Is telling the truth insulting/abusive/offensive?


Is calling someone blind really abusive?

Probably more insulting than abusive.
Groundskeeper Willie
700
·
7.5K
·
over 16 years
james dean wrote:
Smithy wrote:
2ndBest wrote:
Feverish wrote:
2ndBest wrote:

Isn't all this about players taking responsibility for their actions? Stop being a dick and you won't get suspended. Pretty simple.

perhaps ban any speaking at football pitches? 

Stop being a dickhead and launch an argument for why you should be able to abuse refs. If that is what you truly believe.

 


I think Greenie's point (if he has one) is that there is a distinction to be drawn between saying something mildly sweary to an official, and abuse.


For example, currently what you've said above ("stop being a dick") would get you a four week ban. But you've used it in every day conversation, as we all do, so that 4 weeks off seems a bit ridiculous.


Nobody is arguing that you should be able to get up in a ref's face and abuse him (like I did...) or chase him to the changing rooms (like Declan). But saying to a linesman in the heat of the moment "come on mate are you fucking blind" is hardly a 4 week ban offence is it?


If that linesman turned around and said "fuck off mate you can't see anything from where you're sitting" then fair play to him too. 


I mean, how thin skinned can you be?


What I don't get is why referees care so much about what a player thinks of a decision.  The best refs just ignore all that rubbish, they're the ones with the whistle, they're making the decisions and they really don't get worked up about it.  They just get on with the game.  It's when you think that a referee cares that you're more likely to have a go (and I have been guilty of some referee baiting in my time I freely admit, which I am not that proud of).  


The good refs truly do not give a toss about what some spotty 21 year old (yes I was spotty as a 21 year old) is saying to them.  I don't think players should be abusing refs but nor do I think any of what has been described here constitutes "abusing refs"

Because refs are human? A lot of players get easily wound up with a bit of chat, refs are no different
Marquee
2.1K
·
8.2K
·
over 17 years
2ndBest wrote:
james dean wrote:
nightz wrote:
2ndBest wrote:

The second is the use of insulting/abusive/offensive language. Calling a ref blind, a carnt, or a donkey, etc I think is unacceptable.


Is telling the truth insulting/abusive/offensive?


Is calling someone blind really abusive?

Probably more insulting than abusive.


4 matches for insulting someone?  Seems a bit much to me - even though broadly I agree that it's better to clean things up a bit
Groundskeeper Willie
700
·
7.5K
·
over 16 years
james dean wrote:
2ndBest wrote:
james dean wrote:
nightz wrote:
2ndBest wrote:

The second is the use of insulting/abusive/offensive language. Calling a ref blind, a carnt, or a donkey, etc I think is unacceptable.


Is telling the truth insulting/abusive/offensive?


Is calling someone blind really abusive?

Probably more insulting than abusive.


4 matches for insulting someone?  Seems a bit much to me - even though broadly I agree that it's better to clean things up a bit

Yeah and to clean it up they need to start somewhere. Harsh penalties to begin with might shock some but it's probably the only way to make a difference long term. Although if CF have stated they are cracking down then it shouldn't really be a surprise
Legend
2.1K
·
16K
·
over 17 years
Smithy wrote:

Maybe if the referees were better there wouldn't be so much abuse fired at them. It's a two-way street isn't it?


Or are we genuinely saying that you cannot question or comment on any refereeing decisions, no matter their quality?


Notably, there is no process by which you can appeal or comment on the decisions or quality of a referee. They receive no feedback from players, administrators or fans. They just live in a bubble.


I remember when Bucke wrote a complaint to Graeme Sole which I think was about Tasker not allowing our team to go to the changing sheds at half time for some bizarre reason. Soon after we had Tasker again who hit up Buckle before the game and told him he had filed it under 'T for trash' (the email was just forwarded to him!). Needless to say we didn't get many decisions go our way that day.
Starting XI
280
·
2.7K
·
almost 17 years

I've never actually taken a look at a team card, I assume there isn't anything for rating the referee? If there isn't there really should be. It's all well and good having refs evaluated by other refs, but CF needs to know how the players feel about them, too. IMO it is a real problem if a ref is consistently earning the ire of the players he/she is officiating, even if they're technically getting things right.

Marquee
1.1K
·
7.6K
·
almost 13 years

I've never actually taken a look at a team card, I assume there isn't anything for rating the referee? If there isn't there really should be. It's all well and good having refs evaluated by other refs, but CF needs to know how the players feel about them, too. IMO it is a real problem if a ref is consistently earning the ire of the players he/she is officiating, even if they're technically getting things right.

CF team cards have a Ref rating box on them and they are reviewed 
Starting XI
280
·
2.7K
·
almost 17 years

Well never mind then.

Listen here Fudgeface
3.7K
·
15K
·
over 14 years
IMO it is a real problem if a ref is consistently earning the ire of the players he/she is officiating, even if they're technically getting things right.
Wouldn't the actual problem here be that the players don't know the rules? I fail to see how this is the refs problem.
Groundskeeper Willie
700
·
7.5K
·
over 16 years
patrick478 wrote:
IMO it is a real problem if a ref is consistently earning the ire of the players he/she is officiating, even if they're technically getting things right.

Wouldn't the actual problem here be that the players don't know the rules? I fail to see how this is the refs problem.

Some refs clash with players more than others. They might be getting enough of the decisions right but if they antagonise players (it happens more than you probably think) they will lose control of the game. In regards to rating refs there is more to it than just getting the majority of decisions right. 
Legend
2.6K
·
17K
·
over 17 years

With regards to that ref rating box thing, are you (in CF football) allowed to criticize refs properly? In Northern football it is widely frowned upon to say anything bad about a referee's performance, even though they are paid to ref and part of our fees go towards their development.

Never got why refs are such a protected species.

Groundskeeper Willie
700
·
7.5K
·
over 16 years

That and some coaches don't use it properly. I've known of some coaches who never rate refs less than 8/10 because they believe it will come back to bite them if they do. 

Split Personalities
57
·
520
·
over 10 years

with regard to a crack down would it not be better to issue more infringements rather than a larger fine?

if abuse is happening and you want to stop it you make a zero tolerance policy and lower the fees/fines.

this would actually go towards correcting the behaviour rather than make a few examples/martyr's of people caught in situations that should never get to  such a level as the smaller matters have been dealt with by the new zero tolerance policy…..

maybe the psychology major flatmate is wrong with his read on behaviour adjustment theory but it did sound like sense last night….

Appiah without the pace
6.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years

Wharf first teamer sent off for swearing/abusing ref today.

WeeNix
130
·
810
·
over 16 years

Blanket 4 weeks then. ..

Listen here Fudgeface
3.7K
·
15K
·
over 14 years
2ndBest wrote:

Wharf first teamer sent off for swearing/abusing ref today.

Straight red or second yellow?
Phoenix Academy
46
·
220
·
about 11 years

I saw a second yellow.


PS It's 5.30 an no results are on CF website. Not even the cup game played at noon.

Bring back Critter!!


Doc
Trialist
25
·
56
·
almost 11 years
Loftus Road wrote:

I saw a second yellow.


PS It's 5.30 an no results are on CF website. Not even the cup game played at noon.

Bring back Critter!!



Second yellow although ref antagonized the wharf player into it. Agree it could've been reacted to differently but referees should not be allowed to chip away at players. 

Legend
2.1K
·
16K
·
over 17 years
2ndBest wrote:

Wharf first teamer sent off for swearing/abusing ref today.

Was a yellow. Followed first yellow which wasn't IMO . If Declan had been there Linney would have had déjà vu

Appiah without the pace
6.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years

Player receives yellow.

Player tells ref it was fucking bullshit (or something similar)

Ref tells him to be quiet.

Player gives him another spray.

Player gets second yellow.



Legend
2.1K
·
16K
·
over 17 years

Yeah no argument with second yellow

Appiah without the pace
6.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years

On the first yellow, I didn't actually see it, but he was warned a few minutes earlier for a bad tackle. 

Legend
2.1K
·
16K
·
over 17 years

Linney wasn't consistent in that second half with the tackles. He let the game flow well in the first though

Doc
Trialist
25
·
56
·
almost 11 years
2ndBest wrote:

Player receives yellow.

Player tells ref it was fucking bullshit (or something similar)

Ref tells him to be quiet.

Player gives him another spray.

Player gets second yellow.




Contrasting version of events making the rounds I guess. End of the day players need to just button it!! 
Linney reffed 1st half well agreed. 
Marquee
1.1K
·
7.6K
·
almost 13 years

UH pushed the limit of AR disputes today. But to their credit it was not abusive. And the young lad did really well. Ref steped in in the 2nd half to help. Penalty was a penalty. Red can was maybe harsh but would keeper have collected the ball off strikers foot . Would have been tight. 

Appiah without the pace
6.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years
Feverish wrote:

Yeah no argument with second yellow

Just banter wasn't it?
First Team Squad
130
·
1.4K
·
over 15 years

IMO Linney is not a great linesman let alone a referee. Thinks he's pritty important in the scheme of the game, which is not the case. The game is about the players not the officials. Who got sent off?

Legend
2.1K
·
16K
·
over 17 years
2ndBest wrote:
Feverish wrote:

Yeah no argument with second yellow

Just banter wasn't it?

I think so

Trialist
15
·
45
·
about 13 years

Good on Linney for being consistent, after all everyone moans about referee's being in consistent. Was there anything in his appointment being Premier  rather than CL. Might be seeing the changing of the guard with Ref ranking, CL refs this weekend all less experienced or younger Whitehead, Botha, Lount, Reily and Beattie no Murphy, Rowbury, Hewitt (in fact haven't seen Hewitt all year), Conger.

You’ll need an account to join the conversation!

Sign in Sign up