feverish::
nobody says diddle in CF club meetings. I reckon CF could say they were changing the shape of the ball to oval and no one would say boo.
Not sure if the club reps just want to toe the line, are out of touch with goings-on, or if they just don't give a rats.
That makes it important that there is a good mix on the Board. I'm not sure (m)any could relate to the Cap 1 'issue'.
who is spartacus:::
i did, See above post on smithy's comments
but one is not enough it takes all members to actually read and understand what is happening and ask questions and make suggestions .
part of this is information is not given before the meetings so people what to take it back it to discuss before saying anything.this is not the way of the past (20 years back) but it seems to be the way things are done now.
funny how in a world of electronics and computers we get worse communications than in the days of letters and phones
most clubs would see the 11 team league issue as a stupid idea but feel it is not there place to comment but it is really there place to have a say and be counted.
my issue with Capital football on the 11 team league is
(1) no consultation with other clubs affected
(2) who would be affected if we apply the normal rules of relegation and is there a real reason to change this rule to benefit all clubs affected ( lots of club/teams thought they were saved from relegation but have to take the bitter pill of 3 teams down) cap2 should have 10 teams perhaps then all leagues would be normal 2 down?
(3) why do anything if no complaint or lobbing to the board has been done as previously stated in other forum threads
(4) even NZF see's there are floors in there reasoning
rant over
i still think they will stick with there decision