Post history

History for TopLeft07

CF Governance

Back to topic

Current version

Posted June 06, 2014 03:16 · last edited June 06, 2014 03:17

Feverish wrote:
2ndBest wrote:
Feverish wrote:
2ndBest wrote:

Was wondering how long it would take before you played the banter card. Banter is between friends where you know what their threshold for tolerance is. Telling someone you don't know they aren't good at their job is not banter.

Who has been banned for cursing at themselves?

A player got carded for calling himself a muppet on the weekend. Also a case where someone genuinely was having banter with a ref which ended in a ban. There have been a lot of calls in the past two years that have been wrongly punished (in my eyes). Then there was the incident where a spectator made up a complete fabrication and went to CF. As an administrator who has to deal with all this it is a waste of resources.  But as Term says suck it up. #pashunisnotacrime

If it was truly banter then surely the ref wouldn't have reported it.

You would have hoped so. Haven't seen the 80 year old ref from chch again fortunately.

I'm sure you guys can say if ten percent are harshly done by then all good - as you don't have to deal with it..

I know people at clubs who have to deal with it, most of the time (exceptional cases aside) they tell the members to suck it up when they disagree with a refs decision or cap football ban. More often than not the offender is having a yarn and deserved it, tough luck if they didn't.

Previous versions

1 version
TopLeft07 edited June 06, 2014 03:17
Feverish wrote:
2ndBest wrote:
Feverish wrote:
2ndBest wrote:

Was wondering how long it would take before you played the banter card. Banter is between friends where you know what their threshold for tolerance is. Telling someone you don't know they aren't good at their job is not banter.

Who has been banned for cursing at themselves?

A player got carded for calling himself a muppet on the weekend. Also a case where someone genuinely was having banter with a ref which ended in a ban. There have been a lot of calls in the past two years that have been wrongly punished (in my eyes). Then there was the incident where a spectator made up a complete fabrication and went to CF. As an administrator who has to deal with all this it is a waste of resources.  But as Term says suck it up. #pashunisnotacrime

If it was truly banter then surely the ref wouldn't have reported it.

You would have hoped so. Haven't seen the 80 year old ref from chch again fortunately.

I'm sure you guys can say if ten percent are harshly done by then all good - as you don't have to deal with it..

I know people at clubs who have to deal with it, 90% of the time (exceptional cases aside) they tell the members to suck it up when they disagree with a refs decision or cap football ban. More often than not the offender is having a yarn and deserved it, tough luck if they didn't.