Post history

History for Critical_Lemon

Fees to play Football by Federation

Back to topic

Current version

Posted March 27, 2019 04:30 · last edited March 27, 2019 04:33

Marron_Men wrote:

Yeah - carrying a squad of over 15/16 is near impossible to operate fairly without rolling subs.

Teams should have the right to refuse promotion if they did not finish first in the grade they were playing in.

Argument could be said it is unfair to push relegated teams back up to the grade they just fell from however. Purely comms imo.

Stuff like this does happen at the intersections of the game, like amateur to semi-pro and semi-pro to professional, all the time around the world though. Sometimes it's clubs/teams that want to go up not meeting the criteria of the league above because their stadium is too small or whatever, sometimes it's that the club/team isn't interested in making a fundamental change like having to figure out going fully professional. You have to have these thresholds though, because it would be worse to let some teams have rolling subs but not others. 

I think that once it's below Cap 4 they could perhaps create an entirely separate structure for "social" teams. If a new "serious" club or team wants to join they could potentially just do it at Cap 4, even if it means Cap 4 changes in size from year-to-year.

Previous versions

2 versions
Unknown editor edited March 27, 2019 04:33
Marron_Men wrote:

Yeah - carrying a squad of over 15/16 is near impossible to operate fairly without rolling subs.

Teams should have the right to refuse promotion if they did not finish first in the grade they were playing in.

Argument could be said it is unfair to push relegated teams back up to the grade they just fell from however. Purely comms imo.

Stuff like this does happen at the intersections of the game, like amateur to semi-pro and semi-pro to professional, all the time around the world though. Sometimes it's clubs/teams that want to go up not meeting the criteria of the league above because their stadium is too small or whatever, sometimes it's that the club/team isn't interested in making a fundamental change like having to figure out going fully professional. You have to have these thresholds though, because it would be worse to let some teams have rolling subs but not others. I think that once it's below Cap 4 they could perhaps create an entirely separate structure for "social" teams. If a new "serious" club wants to join they could potentially just do it at Cap 4

Unknown editor edited March 27, 2019 04:32
Marron_Men wrote:

Yeah - carrying a squad of over 15/16 is near impossible to operate fairly without rolling subs.

Teams should have the right to refuse promotion if they did not finish first in the grade they were playing in.

Argument could be said it is unfair to push relegated teams back up to the grade they just fell from however. Purely comms imo.

Stuff like this does happen at the intersections of the game, like amateur to semi-pro and semi-pro to professional, all the time around the world though. Sometimes it's clubs/teams that want to go up not meeting the criteria of the league above because their stadium is too small or whatever, sometimes it's that the club/team isn't interested in making a fundamental change like having to figure out going fully professional. You have to have these thresholds though, because it would be worse to let some teams have rolling subs but not others. I have absolutely no idea if Cap 4 is the right league to have as that demarcation however.