Post history

History for zonknz

Current version

Posted March 31, 2018 20:44 · last edited March 31, 2018 21:03

It is not a stupid answer. Players are free to play for who they wish and cannot be stood over as it breaches The Bill Of Rights which allows for freedom of association.

It's an extremely stupid answer.

Freedom of association is generally held as the right to form societies, clubs or movements free from government interference. Capital Football is a hardly established by government decree.

There are no provisions blocking any player from playing for western suburbs. Just because i can kick a ball, doesn't mean i can then demand to turn out for their central league team.

In the same way, Ole can select players based on a set of development criteria they feel relevant. Please point to case law which has determined otherwise.

Previous versions

5 versions

Unknown editor edited March 31, 2018 21:03

whatever wrote:

It is not a stupid answer. Players are free to play for who they wish and cannot be stood over as it breaches The Bill Of Rights which allows for freedom of association.

It's an extremely stupid answer.

Freedom of association is generally held the right to form societies, clubs or movements free from government interference. Capital Football is a hardly established by government decree.

There are no provisions blocking any player from playing for western suburbs. Just because i can kick a ball, doesn't mean i can then demand to turn out for their central league team.

In the same way, Ole can select players based on a set of development criteria they feel relevant. Please point to case law which has determined otherwise.

Unknown editor edited March 31, 2018 21:01

whatever wrote:

It is not a stupid answer. Players are free to play for who they wish and cannot be stood over as it breaches The Bill Of Rights which allows for freedom of association.

It's an extremely stupid answer.

Freedom of association is generally held the right to form societies, clubs or movements free from government interference. Capital Football is a hardly established by government decree.

There are no provisions blocking any player from playing for western suburbs. Just because i can kick a ball, doesn't mean i can then demand to turn out for their central league team.

In the same way, Ole can select players based on a set of development criteria they feel relevant. Please point to case law which has determined otherwise.

Unknown editor edited March 31, 2018 20:49

whatever wrote:

It is not a stupid answer. Players are free to play for who they wish and cannot be stood over as it breaches The Bill Of Rights which allows for freedom of association.

It's an extremely stupid answer.

There are no provisions blocking any player from playing for western suburbs. Just because i can kick a ball, doesn't mean i can then demand to turn out for their central league team.

In the same way, Ole can select players based on a set of development criteria they feel relevant. Please point to case law which has determined otherwise.

Unknown editor edited March 31, 2018 20:46

whatever wrote:

It is not a stupid answer. Players are free to play for who they wish and cannot be stood over as it breaches The Bill Of Rights which allows for freedom of association.

It's an extremely stupid answer.

There are no provisions blocking any player from playing for western suburbs. Just because i can kick a ball, doesn't mean i can then demand to turn out for their central league team.

Unknown editor edited March 31, 2018 20:44

whatever wrote:

It is not a stupid answer. Players are free to play for who they wish and cannot be stood over as it breaches The Bill Of Rights which allows for freedom of association.

It's an extremely stupid answer.

There are no provisions blocking any player from playing for western suburbs. Just because i can kick a ball, doesn't mean i can demand to turn out for their central league team.