Its the way it should be, as the Can U coach he shouldn't be involved as a MPL coach.
Wonder if this will see a downward slide for Tech in terms of players leaving over the next few seasons (ie: the united players who have gone there).
When keith was offered the job for Canty he was already manager of Woolston, he was offered the Canty job because of how well he'd done at tech along with the two games against the phoenix. At the time Canty were aware he would continue his association with tech. Canty were quite happy for him to continue doing the two until a few clubs put their two cents in claiming unfair advantage etc. Most of the lads that played for Canty from Tech were Tech players first not the other way around. The exceptions were Terris, Swaney and Barton. Tech set the standard for the last two seasons and due to that success people would point to having an unfair advantage because we had the Canterbury manager. The fact is players came to Tech because they were winning, end of story. The likes of Burnside and Bays who have inve$ted heavily in their squad should be the ones criticised. Tech, like the Western team that essentially won the National Youth League for Canterbury have always had the talent they just needed something to bring it together. That glue was Braithwaite and Pittman. Rant over
Wonder if this will see a downward slide for Tech in terms of players leaving over the next few seasons (ie: the united players who have gone there).
Oh yeah Tech won't win the league this year, but downward slide, no chance Gings.