They're the same crowd who are completely oblivious to the fact that there are two of their clubs up for sale that seemingly no-one wants to touch with a 10ft barge-pole.
Get it up ya ockers! ✌️
Also
COYN!
https://forum.insidesport.com.au/3090984/Auckland-to-enter-ALM-next-year-ALW-to-follow-in-2025-Comments
Exhibit A :)
Lulz. A 4 negative replies, a couple of positives and two on a completely pointless tangent about promotion and relegation. Not much of a sample size!
https://t.co/87ojPS4geL
— Nick Galatas (@NickGalatas) November 21, 2023
The day after we announce expansion with clubs rooted in the community, we do the opposite. How will we connect our game if we perpetuate two paths? How does our governance model unite?
Language says it all. One can't "build roots". Things grow from them. pic.twitter.com/0YP97Q6m5X
Galatas and the "NSL bitters" who populate the Inside Sport forums have a dream of a fully-connected pyramid of Australia football with P&R at all levels. They point out, correctly, that that can't happen with the A-League precisely because the huge licence fees mean that the Bill Foleys of the world are not going to risk their investments being relegated. Galatas is confused because the NSD is precisely what people like him have been fighting for for years, but expanding the A-League with new franchises (rather than promoting from top NSD teams) is absolutely the opposite. So he has a point that FA and APL are at cross purposes here.
You have to remember that some of these people are so extreme they actually dream of the A-League disappearing entirely and South Melbourne, Sydney Ustaše 58 etc. returning to their "rightful place" as the top level of Oz football. You can't say to them "but the Glory/Jets are broke" because they'll just say "good, let them die, let all the franchises die". (Although of course Glory and Jets were NSL clubs rather than franchises invented for the A-League, which ruins the argument.)