"not enough impact" changes things from objective to subjective.
Intentionally pulling a player's shirt from behind with no intend to play the ball should objectively be a foul regardless, now it's up to the referee to say whether he feels like a foul or not, when where do you draw the line.
Intentionally pulling a player's shirt from behind with no intend to play the ball should objectively be a foul regardless, now it's up to the referee to say whether he feels like a foul or not, when where do you draw the line.
Well sounds like an invitation to openly just make it up as you go along, which suits those c- just fine.
I mean only Mexicans and Kiwis are cheats. Aussies can’t be, everyone knows that. So start from that and make up the rules to suit that requirement…
The underarm was perfectly legal remember. Cricket authorities just assumed there’d be no one c-ish enough to do it.
A league refs determining the foul continuum: