Post history

History for 20 Legend

Auckland Pride - Make Auckland Great Again

Back to topic

Current version

Posted March 01, 2025 08:56 · last edited March 01, 2025 08:58

Having only seem replays at the stadiums the penalties seem to be correct by the letter of the law.

But I'm still gonna complain that.... (a) The first one would absolutely never be given for say, the Nix (b) That level of contact is apparently a foul, but tugging a defender to the ground "isn't enough" (e.g., the foul on Elliot in Adelaide) and (c) there was a foul in the build-up for the second which wasn't called and doesn't get looked at.

Otherwise, I actually thought Auckland were absolute wank in the first half. Despite the two goals, they looked lethargic. Probably a little complacent after going two ahead.

Previous versions

2 versions
Unknown editor edited March 01, 2025 08:58
Having only seem replays at the stadiums the penalties seem to be correct by the letter of the law.

But I'm still gonna complain that.... (a) The first one would absolutely never be given for say, the Nix (b) That level of contact is apparently a foul, but tugging a defender to the ground "isn't enough" (e.g., the foul on Elliot in Adelaide) and (c) there was a foul in the build-up for the second which wasn't called and doesn't get looked at.

Otherwise, thought Auckland were absolute wank in the first half. Despite the two goals, they looked lethargic. Probably a little complacent after going two ahead.
Unknown editor edited March 01, 2025 08:58
Having only seem replays at the stadiums the penalties seem to be correct by the letter of the law.

But I'm still gonna complain that.... (a) The first one would absolutely never be given for say, the Nix (b) That level of contact is apparently a foul, but tugging a defender to the ground "isn't enough" (e.g., the foul on Elliot in Adelaide) and (c) there was a foul in the build-up for the second which wasn't called and doesn't get looked at.