If you want to say this:
As a result, on 5 December 1921, the FA imposed a ban on women's football, stating that "the game of football is quite unsuitable for females and should not be encouraged"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bans_of_women%27s_association_football
(Which places the FA in this article next to free societies like the Soviet Union and Afghanistan. )
don’t start with BS waffle about core business, just say you don’t want a women’s team and won’t go to a single game.
Here’s what Christchurch thought then:
‘According to Christchurch newspaper The Star in 1922, the head of the Canterbury Football Association stated that "the men in England had tried to stop the ladies from playing soccer for the simple reason that it affected their gate takings."’
Or perhaps try the other route, and feign concern about ACL injuries while going down the Spain/Yugoslavia path - woman are too dainty to play.
Football ‘demanded qualities that were diametrically opposed to those of women’s bodily constitution.’ according to the Spanish.
If you’re proposing an economy where wealth is distributed so the lower and middle classes don’t need two income streams to live and most businesses are shut on Sundays to allow for rest and football, well perhaps that’s the start of a conversation though!
Focus on core business, creating income for consumers and time for families to enjoy their consumer products. Right? Or we’re playing first abolish the customer yeh? Can’t have a stadium full of Mowbrays, though one or two is helpful…
As a result, on 5 December 1921, the FA imposed a ban on women's football, stating that "the game of football is quite unsuitable for females and should not be encouraged"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bans_of_women%27s_association_football
(Which places the FA in this article next to free societies like the Soviet Union and Afghanistan. )
don’t start with BS waffle about core business, just say you don’t want a women’s team and won’t go to a single game.
Here’s what Christchurch thought then:
‘According to Christchurch newspaper The Star in 1922, the head of the Canterbury Football Association stated that "the men in England had tried to stop the ladies from playing soccer for the simple reason that it affected their gate takings."’
Or perhaps try the other route, and feign concern about ACL injuries while going down the Spain/Yugoslavia path - woman are too dainty to play.
Football ‘demanded qualities that were diametrically opposed to those of women’s bodily constitution.’ according to the Spanish.
If you’re proposing an economy where wealth is distributed so the lower and middle classes don’t need two income streams to live and most businesses are shut on Sundays to allow for rest and football, well perhaps that’s the start of a conversation though!
Focus on core business, creating income for consumers and time for families to enjoy their consumer products. Right? Or we’re playing first abolish the customer yeh? Can’t have a stadium full of Mowbrays, though one or two is helpful…