oh I get the concept of being disruptive!
I just dont associate it with proper protest - the point of a protest is to get the attention of a group/person in power to get them to reverse some decision they've made.
Disrupting others who have no impact on said decision is not effective in my opinion. It just annoys the innocent bystanders who often have no idea about what the agst is about. Like the railway protests recently disrupting motorway traffic. Disrupted a lot of people and effected zero change.
Case and point - the APL accounced yesterday, the fanbase has errupted online and vocally voiced their displeasure abnout this - APL are now holding an urgent meeting tomorrow. No games needed to be disrupted, the attention has been gained - if the decision is reversed then fan pwer has won out.
However, that $12m hole is gonna need to be filled somehow.
I just dont associate it with proper protest - the point of a protest is to get the attention of a group/person in power to get them to reverse some decision they've made.
Disrupting others who have no impact on said decision is not effective in my opinion. It just annoys the innocent bystanders who often have no idea about what the agst is about. Like the railway protests recently disrupting motorway traffic. Disrupted a lot of people and effected zero change.
Case and point - the APL accounced yesterday, the fanbase has errupted online and vocally voiced their displeasure abnout this - APL are now holding an urgent meeting tomorrow. No games needed to be disrupted, the attention has been gained - if the decision is reversed then fan pwer has won out.
However, that $12m hole is gonna need to be filled somehow.