Post history

History for Nelfoos

General A-League discussion

Back to topic

Current version

Posted December 14, 2022 00:45 · last edited December 14, 2022 00:48

theprof
Nelfoos
LG
There is another idea. Victoria counter the NSW offer with an even bigger offer and see what happens!!

That's exactly what the APL is banking on in 3 years time and hey, maybe it would've happened if they were allowed a chance to make an offer in the first place.

Suggesting there was some colusion with the melbourne clubs and the APL/NSW govt to make this happen? It wouldnt shock me if that was the case.

This league has an unbalance representation, Sydney FC seems to get a massive say in how things are done, the Melbourne teams as well (I know their fans are upset about it but what have their owners said?) Smaller club owners like CCM, Newcastle, WSW are all gonna be ok with it becasue it has minimal impact on them. 
Not at all, Danny Townsend stated that this is a 3 year term and after that it will go to the highest bidder. Victoria wasn't given a chance to put their name in the hat for this one, it was a behind closed doors deal. You'd think Victoria is likely the only other real option to NSW though. Victory and City knew about it by virtue of having club members as APL directors and I'm sure supported it to varying degrees, but not suggesting anything illegal!

The APL CEO is literally ex-CEO of Sydney FC and he did both jobs for a bit. You can't tell me that's a good thing for the league and for it being a level playing field.


Previous versions

1 version
Unknown editor edited December 14, 2022 00:48
theprof
Nelfoos
LG
There is another idea. Victoria counter the NSW offer with an even bigger offer and see what happens!!

That's exactly what the APL is banking on in 3 years time and hey, maybe it would've happened if they were allowed a chance to make an offer in the first place.

Suggesting there was some colusion with the melbourne clubs and the APL/NSW govt to make this happen? It wouldnt shock me if that was the case.

This league has an unbalance representation, Sydney FC seems to get a massive say in how things are done, the Melbourne teams as well (I know their fans are upset about it but what have their owners said?) Smaller club owners like CCM, Newcastle, WSW are all gonna be ok with it becasue it has minimal impact on them. 
Not at all, Danny Townsend stated that this is a 3 year term and after that it will go to the highest bidder. Victoria wasn't given a chance to put their name in the hat for this one, it was a behind closed doors deal. You'd think Victoria is likely the only other real option to NSW though. Victory and City knew about it by virtue of having club members as APL directors and I'm sure supported it to varying degrees, but not suggesting anything illegal!

The APL CEO is literally ex-CEO of Sydney FC and he did both jobs for a bit. You can't tell me that's a good thing for the league.