Current version

Posted January 15, 2016 00:22 · last edited January 15, 2016 00:24

Tegal wrote:

ownership groups should not be able to own more than one club. And this is one of the reasons why. Loopholes.

"City remains interested in Anthony Caceres, who could join on loan from parent club Manchester City after signing from Central Coast, though he would take up $300,000 of the salary cap under new parent club/loan regulations."

Guessing because its a January deal, it would only be a 150k cap hit. So they might release Williams then combine his saved salary cap with Gameiro's IR cap and use that to loan in Caceres at 150k salary cap.

Previous versions

2 versions
RR edited January 15, 2016 00:24
Tegal wrote:

ownership groups should not be able to own more than one club. And this is one of the reasons why. Loopholes.

"City remains interested in Anthony Caceres, who could join on loan from parent club Manchester City after signing from Central Coast, though he would take up $300,000 of the salary cap under new parent club/loan regulations."

Guessing because its a January deal, it would only be a 150k cap hit. Guessing they might release Williams then combine his saved salary cap with Gameiro's IR cap and use that to loan in Caceres at 150k salary cap.

RR edited January 15, 2016 00:22
Tegal wrote:

ownership groups should not be able to own more than one club. And this is one of the reasons why. Loopholes.

"City remains interested in Anthony Caceres, who could join on loan from parent club Manchester City after signing from Central Coast, though he would take up $300,000 of the salary cap under new parent club/loan regulations."

Guessing because its a January deal, it would only be a 150k cap hit. Guessing they might release Williams then combine his saved salary cap with Gameiro's IR cap and use that to loan in Caceres at 150k salary cap.