Post history

History for bwtcf

Q&A Thread

Back to topic

Current version

Posted June 17, 2013 02:53 · last edited June 17, 2013 02:54

theprof wrote:
Tegal wrote:

I imagine no one. Guess for realism you'd say NZF. 

hmmm, seems a little out of kilter, if NZF got the money then surely it would be distibuted across the country - I wonder if there is a way to have the funds distributed to contributing teams?


That's not how it happens, and it is a good thing... because if there was there would DEFINITELY be a vesterd interest for the National coach in picking players from their club(s).

Previous versions

2 versions
bwtcf edited June 17, 2013 02:54
theprof wrote:
Tegal wrote:

I imagine no one. Guess for realism you'd say NZF. 

hmmm, seems a little out of kilter, if NZF got the money then surely it would be distibuted across the country - I wonder if there is a way to have the funds distributed to contributing teams?


That's not how it happens, and it is a good thing... because if there was there would DEFINITELY be a vesterd interest for the National coach in picking players from their club(s).
bwtcf edited June 17, 2013 02:53
theprof wrote:
Tegal wrote:

I imagine no one. Guess for realism you'd say NZF. 

hmmm, seems a little out of kilter, if NZF got the money then surely it would be distibuted across the country - I wonder if there is a way to have the funds distributed to contributing teams?


That's not how it happens, and it is a good thing... because if there was there would DEFINITELY be a vesterd interest for the National  coach in picking players from their club(s).