Post history

History for Critical_Lemon

2014/15 Transfer Speculation

Back to topic

Current version

Posted June 07, 2014 00:39 · last edited June 07, 2014 00:45

Given the MLS' history of getting involved in big-name player moves (such as deciding that Dempsey went to Seattle) I wouldn't be surprised if they have told NYCFC they can't have both Villa and Lampard, which they can do due to the way the league is set up, with clubs and players actually owned by the MLS itself, etc. I actually would not be surprised if Lampard goes to Orlando and then gets loaned to Sydney under the same kind of deal as Villa's.

Previous versions

2 versions
Critical_Lemon edited June 07, 2014 00:45

Given the MLS' history of getting involved in big-name player moves (such as making sure Dempsey went to Seattle) I wouldn't be surprised if they have told NYCFC they can't have both Villa and Lampard, which they can do due to the way the league is set up, with clubs and players actually owned by the MLS itself, etc. I actually would not be surprised if Lampard goes to Orlando and then gets loaned to Sydney under the same kind of deal as Villa's.

Critical_Lemon edited June 07, 2014 00:44

Given the MLS' history of getting involved in big-name payer moves (such as making sure Dempsey went to Seattle) I wouldn't be surprised if they have told NYCFC they can't have both Villa and Lampard, which they can do due to the way the league is set up, with clubs and players actually owned by the MLS itself, etc. I actually would not be surprised if Lampard goes to Orlando and then gets loaned to Sydney under the same kind of deal as Villa's.