"No disrespect to Fenton at all, he’s a great and dependable player. We need a back up at RB and I think both Kirwan and JHS would provide great competition. Personally would probably start Fenton over JHS, whilst I’d give Kirwan the nod over Louis to start with. I still think Louis is a very good player, but if a new RB is potentially better why not play them?"
No disrespect Friar Tuck, but I read this twice and it still just does not make any sense.
Firstly, you say that 'we need backup at RB', and I agree with that. Then you follow this up by saying that Fenton should be that backup? To someone untried at this level? Because a new RB is 'potentially better'?
What comparison can you make, at what level, between Fenton and Kirwan, to arrive at that conclusion?
No disrespect Friar Tuck, but I read this twice and it still just does not make any sense.
Firstly, you say that 'we need backup at RB', and I agree with that. Then you follow this up by saying that Fenton should be that backup? To someone untried at this level? Because a new RB is 'potentially better'?
What comparison can you make, at what level, between Fenton and Kirwan, to arrive at that conclusion?