Current version

Posted February 27, 2014 02:15 · last edited February 27, 2014 03:20

Doubt they'd care.

CFT have already stated that petone RFC will use the ground/facility. That hasn't stopped people from saying that there will no longer be any club sport on the ground. 

There are obviously valid concerns that people have. But most of it (and of what is on that page) is just your typical nz being against something just because...where if you challenge them rationally, they can't come up with a genuine reason as to why they're against it. 

I actually quite liked the write up by the Hutt news editor. Thought it was nicely balanced and summed up the issue on both sides. 

Previous versions

2 versions
Tegal edited February 27, 2014 03:20

Doubt they'd care.

CFT have already stated that petone RFC will use the ground/facility. That hasn't stopped people from saying that there will no longer be any club sport on the ground. 

There are obviously valid concerns that people have. But most of it (and of what is on that page) is just your typical nz being against something just because...where if you challenge them rationally, they can't come up with a genuine reason as to why they're against it. 

I actually quite liked the write up by the Hutt need editor. Thought it was nicely balanced and summed up the issue on both sides. 

Tegal edited February 27, 2014 02:18

Doubt they'd care.

CFT have already stated that petone RFC will use the ground/facility. That hasn't stopped people from saying that there will no longer be any club sport on the ground. 

There are obviously valid concerns that people have. But most of it (and of what is on that page) is just your typical nz being against something just because. 

I actually quite liked the write up by the Hutt need editor. Thought it was nicely balanced and summed up the issue on both sides.