I thought we always had Roly next season, it was the one after that we were worried we would lose him. Or am I completely wrong?
We had him contracted
but you don't necessarily keep an unhappy player
I thought there was a fair bit of talk about him being marketable, and maybe unhappy with the league kicking chunks out of him every week
so I was pleased to hear via Ernie that Roly is committed to play here next season
The way I read this, the fact that Ernie has gone to the trouble of saying he has a commitment from Roly suggests there may have been some doubt
but, just my reading between the lines