Post history

History for AucklandPhoenix

Contracted Players - Return of the Long Pins

Back to topic

Current version

Posted April 17, 2020 06:19 · last edited April 17, 2020 07:08

el grapadura wrote:

valeo wrote:

AucklandPhoenix wrote:

well my tax is being used to finance Matti's wage subsidy, so I wouldn't mind knowing what country he is in if required back to work

Bearing in mind he does not qualify to enter NZ under current border exemptions 

Unless it is under humanitarian grounds - which even for the NIx may be a tough ask

Answer the question Dome, just for the sake of being honest 

Do you track the guy down the street who's on the dole too? Weird fella.

Not only that, but ask for his daily expenditure supported by receipts too.

Yep if the nIx are not being honest about his employment situation, bloody oats. Previously it was bash the beneficiary

If a beneficiary went overseas and was not available for work I'm sure winz would be interested and cut the benefit

Now, employers are beneficiaries and their details are on public record  

They need to understand that 

Just be honest, if there is nothing to see here 

No comment is ummmmmm, not good enough 

Previous versions

13 versions
Unknown editor edited April 17, 2020 07:08
el grapadura wrote:
valeo wrote:
AucklandPhoenix wrote:

well my tax is being used to finance Matti's wage subsidy, so I wouldn't mind knowing what country he is in if required back to work

Bearing in mind he does not qualify to enter NZ under current border exemptions 

Unless it is under humanitarian grounds - which even for the NIx may be a tough ask

Answer the question Dome, just for the sake of being honest 

Do you track the guy down the street who's on the dole too? Weird fella.

Not only that, but ask for his daily expenditure supported by receipts too.

Yep if the nIx are not being honest about his employment situation, bloody oats. Previously it was bash the beneficiary

If a beneficiary went overseas and was not available for work I'm sure winz would be interested and potentially cut the benefit

Now, employers are beneficiaries and their details are on public record  

They need to understand that 

Just be honest, if there is nothing to see here 

No comment is ummmmmm, not good enough 

Unknown editor edited April 17, 2020 07:08
el grapadura wrote:
valeo wrote:
AucklandPhoenix wrote:

well my tax is being used to finance Matti's wage subsidy, so I wouldn't mind knowing what country he is in if required back to work

Bearing in mind he does not qualify to enter NZ under current border exemptions 

Unless it is under humanitarian grounds - which even for the NIx may be a tough ask

Answer the question Dome, just for the sake of being honest 

Do you track the guy down the street who's on the dole too? Weird fella.

Not only that, but ask for his daily expenditure supported by receipts too.

Yep if the nIx are not being honest about his employment situation, bloody oats. Previously it was bash the beneficiary

If a beneficiary went overseas and was not available for work I'm sure winz would be interested and potentially cut the benefit - yes. That happens and yes I'm sure plenty have been dobbed in 

Now, employers are beneficiaries and their details are on public record  

They need to understand that 

Just be honest, if there is nothing to see here 

No comment is ummmmmm, not good enough 

Unknown editor edited April 17, 2020 07:07
el grapadura wrote:
valeo wrote:
AucklandPhoenix wrote:

well my tax is being used to finance Matti's wage subsidy, so I wouldn't mind knowing what country he is in if required back to work

Bearing in mind he does not qualify to enter NZ under current border exemptions 

Unless it is under humanitarian grounds - which even for the NIx may be a tough ask

Answer the question Dome, just for the sake of being honest 

Do you track the guy down the street who's on the dole too? Weird fella.

Not only that, but ask for his daily expenditure supported by receipts too.

Yep if the nIx are not being honest about his employment situation, bloody oats. Previously it was bash the beneficiary

If a beneficiary went overseas and was not available for work I'm sure winz would be interested

Now, employers are beneficiaries and their details are on public record  

They need to understand that 

Just be honest, if there is nothing to see here 

No comment is ummmmmm, not good enough 

Unknown editor edited April 17, 2020 06:31
el grapadura wrote:
valeo wrote:
AucklandPhoenix wrote:

well my tax is being used to finance Matti's wage subsidy, so I wouldn't mind knowing what country he is in if required back to work

Bearing in mind he does not qualify to enter NZ under current border exemptions 

Unless it is under humanitarian grounds - which even for the NIx may be a tough ask

Answer the question Dome, just for the sake of being honest 

Do you track the guy down the street who's on the dole too? Weird fella.

Not only that, but ask for his daily expenditure supported by receipts too.

Yep if the nIx are not being honest about his employment situation, bloody oats. Previously it was bash the beneficiary

If a beneficiary went overseas and was not available for work I'm sure winz would be interested

Now, employers are beneficiaries and their details are on public record  

They need to understand that if they are not playing by the rules 

Just be honest, if there is nothing to see here 

No comment is ummmmmm, not good enough 

Unknown editor edited April 17, 2020 06:28
el grapadura wrote:
valeo wrote:
AucklandPhoenix wrote:

well my tax is being used to finance Matti's wage subsidy, so I wouldn't mind knowing what country he is in if required back to work

Bearing in mind he does not qualify to enter NZ under current border exemptions 

Unless it is under humanitarian grounds - which even for the NIx may be a tough ask

Answer the question Dome, just for the sake of being honest 

Do you track the guy down the street who's on the dole too? Weird fella.

Not only that, but ask for his daily expenditure supported by receipts too.

Yep if the nIx are not being honest about his employment situation, bloody oats. Previously it was bash the beneficiary

If a beneficiary went overseas and was not available for work I'm sure winz would be interested

Now, employers are beneficiaries and their details are on public record  

They need to understand that if they are not playing by the rules 

Just be honest, if there is nothing to see here 

No comment is ummmmmm 

Unknown editor edited April 17, 2020 06:28
el grapadura wrote:
valeo wrote:
AucklandPhoenix wrote:

well my tax is being used to finance Matti's wage subsidy, so I wouldn't mind knowing what country he is in if required back to work

Bearing in mind he does not qualify to enter NZ under current border exemptions 

Unless it is under humanitarian grounds - which even for the NIx may be a tough ask

Answer the question Dome, just for the sake of being honest 

Do you track the guy down the street who's on the dole too? Weird fella.

Not only that, but ask for his daily expenditure supported by receipts too.

Yep if the nIx are not being honest about his employment situation, bloody oats. Previously it was bash the beneficiary

If a beneficiary went overseas and was not available for work I'm sure winz would be interested

Now, employers are beneficiaries and their details are on public record  

They need to understand that if they are not playing by the rules 

Just be honest, if there is nothing to see here 

No comment is not being honest

Unknown editor edited April 17, 2020 06:27
el grapadura wrote:
valeo wrote:
AucklandPhoenix wrote:

well my tax is being used to finance Matti's wage subsidy, so I wouldn't mind knowing what country he is in if required back to work

Bearing in mind he does not qualify to enter NZ under current border exemptions 

Unless it is under humanitarian grounds - which even for the NIx may be a tough ask

Answer the question Dome, just for the sake of being honest 

Do you track the guy down the street who's on the dole too? Weird fella.

Not only that, but ask for his daily expenditure supported by receipts too.

Yep if the nIx are not being honest about his employment situation, bloody oats. Previously it was bash the beneficiary

If a beneficiary went overseas and was not available for work I'm sure winz would be interested

Now, employers are beneficiaries and their details are on public record  

They need to understand that if they are not playing by the rules 

Just be honest, if there is nothing to see here 

Unknown editor edited April 17, 2020 06:26
el grapadura wrote:
valeo wrote:
AucklandPhoenix wrote:

well my tax is being used to finance Matti's wage subsidy, so I wouldn't mind knowing what country he is in if required back to work

Bearing in mind he does not qualify to enter NZ under current border exemptions 

Unless it is under humanitarian grounds - which even for the NIx may be a tough ask

Answer the question Dome, just for the sake of being honest 

Do you track the guy down the street who's on the dole too? Weird fella.

Not only that, but ask for his daily expenditure supported by receipts too.

Yep if the nIx are not being honest about his employment situation, bloody oats. Previously it was bash the beneficiary

If a beneficiary went overseas and was not available for work I'm sure winz would be interested

Now, employers are beneficiaries and their details are on public record  

They need to understand that if they are not playing by the rules 

Just be honest

Unknown editor edited April 17, 2020 06:25
el grapadura wrote:
valeo wrote:
AucklandPhoenix wrote:

well my tax is being used to finance Matti's wage subsidy, so I wouldn't mind knowing what country he is in if required back to work

Bearing in mind he does not qualify to enter NZ under current border exemptions 

Unless it is under humanitarian grounds - which even for the NIx may be a tough ask

Answer the question Dome, just for the sake of being honest 

Do you track the guy down the street who's on the dole too? Weird fella.

Not only that, but ask for his daily expenditure supported by receipts too.

Yep if the nIx are not being honest about his employment situation, bloody oats. Previously it was bash the beneficiary

Wat if a beneficiary went overseas and WINZ enquired if he/she should get the benefit

Now, employers are beneficiaries 

They need to understand that if they are not playing by the rules 

Just be honest

Unknown editor edited April 17, 2020 06:24
el grapadura wrote:
valeo wrote:
AucklandPhoenix wrote:

well my tax is being used to finance Matti's wage subsidy, so I wouldn't mind knowing what country he is in if required back to work

Bearing in mind he does not qualify to enter NZ under current border exemptions 

Unless it is under humanitarian grounds - which even for the NIx may be a tough ask

Answer the question Dome, just for the sake of being honest 

Do you track the guy down the street who's on the dole too? Weird fella.

Not only that, but ask for his daily expenditure supported by receipts too.

Yep if the nIx are not being honest about his employment situation, bloody oats. Previously it was bash the beneficiary

Now, some employers are beneficiaries 

They need to understand that if they are not playing by the rules 

Just be honest

Unknown editor edited April 17, 2020 06:22
el grapadura wrote:
valeo wrote:
AucklandPhoenix wrote:

well my tax is being used to finance Matti's wage subsidy, so I wouldn't mind knowing what country he is in if required back to work

Bearing in mind he does not qualify to enter NZ under current border exemptions 

Unless it is under humanitarian grounds - which even for the NIx may be a tough ask

Answer the question Dome, just for the sake of being honest 

Do you track the guy down the street who's on the dole too? Weird fella.

Not only that, but ask for his daily expenditure supported by receipts too.

Yep if the nIx are not being honest about his employment situation, bloody oats. Previously it was bash the beneficiary

Now, some employers are beneficiaries 

They need to understand that if they are not playing by the rules 

Unknown editor edited April 17, 2020 06:21
el grapadura wrote:
valeo wrote:
AucklandPhoenix wrote:

well my tax is being used to finance Matti's wage subsidy, so I wouldn't mind knowing what country he is in if required back to work

Bearing in mind he does not qualify to enter NZ under current border exemptions 

Unless it is under humanitarian grounds - which even for the NIx may be a tough ask

Answer the question Dome, just for the sake of being honest 

Do you track the guy down the street who's on the dole too? Weird fella.

Not only that, but ask for his daily expenditure supported by receipts too.

Yep if the nIx are not being honest about his employment situation, bloody oats. Previously it was bash the beneficiary

Now, some employers are beneficiaries 

They need to understand that if they are not playing by the rules as do others (and there are plenty who are)

Unknown editor edited April 17, 2020 06:20
el grapadura wrote:
valeo wrote:
AucklandPhoenix wrote:

well my tax is being used to finance Matti's wage subsidy, so I wouldn't mind knowing what country he is in if required back to work

Bearing in mind he does not qualify to enter NZ under current border exemptions 

Unless it is under humanitarian grounds - which even for the NIx may be a tough ask

Answer the question Dome, just for the sake of being honest 

Do you track the guy down the street who's on the dole too? Weird fella.

Not only that, but ask for his daily expenditure supported by receipts too.

Yep if the nIx are not being honest about his employment situation, bloody oats. Previously it was bash the beneficiary

Now, some employers are beneficiaries