Post history

History for mrsmiis

​Is this the weakest Phoenix team ever?

Back to topic

Current version

Posted April 20, 2019 09:33 · last edited April 20, 2019 09:38

Honestly wasn’t a horrific question to raise at the time of posting. Looking at all this with an eye for criticism, you could have questioned a few things about the team - Mandi had half a lung, no Sheridan, very late news on signings, starting a broken Fenton and unproven Rufer, playing two 33+ year olds and a left back in a three-man defense, signing supposed washouts Williams and Nichols, trusting a 17 year old at left wing back, basing all our attack through a raw teenager, rookie coach... 

Obviously we were completely proven wrong (well, maybe not with Nichols eh) and the team functioned incredibly, but there was reason to be tentative - I know I certainly was, especially after those humbling losses to City and WSW

Previous versions

5 versions
Unknown editor edited April 20, 2019 09:38

Honestly wasn’t a horrific question to raise at the time of posting. Mandi had half a lung, no Sheridan, very late news on signings, starting a broken Fenton and unproven Rufer, playing two 33+ year olds and a left back in a three-man defense, signing supposed washouts Williams and Nichols, trusting a 17 year old at left wing back, basing all our attack through a raw teenager, rookie coach... obviously we were completely proven wrong (well, maybe not with Nichols eh) but there was reason to be tentative - I know I certainly was, especially after those humbling losses to City and WSW

Unknown editor edited April 20, 2019 09:36

Honestly wasn’t a horrific question to raise at the time of posting. Mandi had half a lung, no Sheridan, very late news on signings, starting a broken Fenton and unproven Rufer, playing two 33+ year olds and a left back in a three-man defense, signing supposed washouts Williams and Nichols, trusting a 17 year old at left wing back, basing all our attack through a raw teenager, rookie coach... obviously we were completely proven wrong (well, maybe not with Nichols eh) but there was reason to be tentative - I know I certainly was

Unknown editor edited April 20, 2019 09:36

Honestly wasn’t a horrific question to raise at the time of posting. No Mandi, no Sheridan, very late news on signings, starting a broken Fenton and unproven Rufer, playing two 33+ year olds and a left back in a three-man defense, signing supposed washouts Williams and Nichols, trusting a 17 year old at left wing back, basing all our attack through a raw teenager, rookie coach... obviously we were completely proven wrong (well, maybe not with Nichols eh) but there was reason to be tentative - I know I certainly was

Unknown editor edited April 20, 2019 09:35

Honestly wasn’t a horrific question to raise at the time of posting. No Mandi, no Sheridan, very late need on signings, starting a broken Fenton and unproven Rufer, playing two 33+ year olds and a left back in a three-man defense, signing supposed washouts Williams and Nichols, trusting a 17 year old at left wing back, basing all our attack through a raw teenager, rookie coach... obviously we were completely proven wrong (well, maybe not with Nichols eh) but there was reason to be tentative - I know I certainly was

Unknown editor edited April 20, 2019 09:34

Honestly wasn’t a horrific question to raise at the time of posting. No Mandi, no Sheridan, very late need on signings, starting a broken Fenton and unproven Rufer, signing supposed washouts Williams and Nichols, trusting a 17 year old at left wing back, basing all our attack through a raw teenager, rookie coach... obviously we were completely proven wrong (well, maybe not with Nichols eh) but there was reason to be tentative - I know I certainly was